Jmmmmm
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2005
- Posts
- 2,088
- Likes
- 11
Quote:
They just seem high quality and durable to me. Certainly not a problem, in my opinion.
I'm surprised people are complaining about the treble on these. The karma certainly isn't a bright source, and I think these have plenty of treble. Too much more and they would be bright and fatiguing, imo. And I like the er6i's and ksc35's - it's not like I'm a huge fan of the shure house sound (I'm not). I haven't even stopped listening to these long enough to compare to my other canalphones yet.
Originally Posted by rbilsbor Well since "ramblings" is part of the title of this thread, let me me ask about this: I was a brief E3c owner and the reason it got returned was the sound--specifically the midrange--that everyone has discussed ad naseum. But a smaller thing I didn't like about it was the size of the components--not the earbuds, but the cable itself I thought was too large in diameter, the Y-connector way too bulky, and even the right-angle plug was oversized. From what I can see from various E4/c pictures those components are the same. Has this bothered anyone else? For me they were just too stiff and heavy to be attached to a canalphone (especially if you ever go jogging or workout with them). Thoughts? |
They just seem high quality and durable to me. Certainly not a problem, in my opinion.
I'm surprised people are complaining about the treble on these. The karma certainly isn't a bright source, and I think these have plenty of treble. Too much more and they would be bright and fatiguing, imo. And I like the er6i's and ksc35's - it's not like I'm a huge fan of the shure house sound (I'm not). I haven't even stopped listening to these long enough to compare to my other canalphones yet.