can anyone compare this to the new iBasso CF01?
Shure looks smaller for some reason.
Shure looks smaller for some reason.
My opinion is that the TW1 (with the proper setting) drives the 846 better than the BT2 did.
My opinion is that the TW1 (with the proper setting) drives the 846 better than the BT2 did. The low end is less boomy, base guitar notes are easier to pick up amid thundering drums. Could be that the BT2's impedece wasn't perfect for the 846.
The biggest game changer for me however is the complete lack of microphonics. I usually listen to music while walking or working out. The absence of any cable movement noise alone is worth the price for me.
As far as comfort and for goes, it's impeccable for me. I use a pair of large double flange Spinfit tips. The TW1 never felt uncomfortable after one and a half hour of walking. They also kept the tips in a perfect seal position even though I was sweating and putting on a facial mask during the session. I never had to readjust an earpiece.
Unlike previous Shure cables, the TW1 has a fairly rigid shape. If it doesn't fit you at all, it could get uncomfortable. It also keeps the earplugs in a fairly fixed position. If your tips of choice don't provide a seal at that position, you will need to change them. For me, everything is perfect.
The 846. The other settings I tried sounded to boomy, like an impedance mismatch.And on what settings did you settle? The 425 is definitely louder.
The BT1 only supported SBC. That alone made the product oxymoronic.That is interesting. I also feel the BT2 leans on the boomy side with my SE846. Never would call it not properly driven though. I was always impressed with the SQ out of the BT2. No, it's not as detailed as out of my Mojo, but for a BT module, it's stellar. Always felt like Shure learned a lesson from the crappy BT1 and tuned the BT2 to be compatible with their higher-end lineup.
Technically I think it’s more likely the gain that’s being set. The output impedance is best set to the minimal value available from circuit design (which may pose problem during times of shortcuts such as in-/plugging, but this cannot even happen here since the MMCX connectors don’t shortcut when disconnected/connected). Otherwise output impedance would influence the sound of the in-ears, not just the volume.I don't think the options do any audio processing. I suspect they adjust the output impedance, which affects the frequency response, which affects the perceived volume.
All I need now is a simple small case, for when I don't need the big charging Shure case.
I got 7 hours of playtime on one charge over the course of two days.
The 846. The other settings I tried sounded to boomy, like an impedance mismatch.
The BT1 only supported SBC. That alone made the product oxymoronic.
As I understand this setting, it’s exactly about volume settings: it gives you more spread in the lower volume range with the correct settingNew to this site posting and come here every so often to read certain things. I bought the shure te-1 adapter and use it with my 846s. I was messing around with the setting and noticed that when I selected A-215 as the source. My headphones were much louder. Kinda the same when I selected the A-5. When I selected the 846s it was much lower. Question any of you tried this and have you noticed a sound difference other than loudness? I’m trying to see how much I like this adapter. I have used other true wireless headphones and debating on these M&D MW07 plus and AirPods Pro.
As I understand this setting, it’s exactly about volume settings: it gives you more spread in the lower volume range with the correct setting