So I did a short comparison to the stock cable today. Nothing extensive, just a quick 30 min comparison between the stock cable and RAL. Because honestly, ATM I'm not that interested to do these comparisons. I'm VERY pleased with my setup and I try to keep it as it is as long as possible. I was asked to do this comparison so here we go.
Here's some information about the test and what I found out.
I used my rig which you can see in my signature and for test tracks I used Rush, Massive Attack, Steve Vai and Pink Floyd. This is quite the basic stuff when I test hifi equipments.
I used the newest foobar2000 with crossfeed plugin turned on.
Both cables are fully burned in (over 200 hours) and so are my headphones (probably somewhere between 500 and 1000 hours).
About the cable itself:
It's very well built and has a solid construction. It's slightly microphonic when it scratches against a table or something but it doesn't bother me at all. It's very flexible (more than G52 was but not as flexible as Headphile V2) so it's quite easy to handle. The purple color isn't for everybody but I think it looks cool. You can choose a different color if you want, just mention about it when you order the cable. At least that's what akwok said earlier.
About the sound:
I switched back to the stock cable today and the differences were what I expected them to be. First of all the stock cable has more muffled sound with less separation and clarity. RAL with its silver construction brings you all the details and sparkles from the tracks without losing anything. The feeling of muffled sound gets stronger due to the more overwhelming bass with the stock cable. With RAL there's less bass but it has better quality. It's faster, tighter and in better control. Silver usually has this effect to bass and so it is with RAL also.
People often say that silver might make the sound too bright and revealing and so lead to fatiguing sound. That's not the case with RAL. I've never had to take off the headphones because of getting fatigued, sibilance or anything like that. Sound is still very enjoyable without any annoying peaks in the highest tones.
With the stock cable, the sound is more in my head. With RAL the soundstage opens up nicely and there's more space and air in the sound. I also have this feeling of more coherent sound with RAL than with the stock cable. It's like there's something missing when I use the stock cable now.
So overall I'm very pleased with RAL and I have no regrets paying the $199 price for it. It's not even a bad price compared to many other manufacturers. You get a 2 meter long cable with that price.
So I hope this helps you people looking for an upgrade cable for HD650. I really think that RAL belongs to the same class with "the legendary" Equinox, ZU and Moon Audio products (and RnB G52).
Here's some information about the test and what I found out.
I used my rig which you can see in my signature and for test tracks I used Rush, Massive Attack, Steve Vai and Pink Floyd. This is quite the basic stuff when I test hifi equipments.
I used the newest foobar2000 with crossfeed plugin turned on.
Both cables are fully burned in (over 200 hours) and so are my headphones (probably somewhere between 500 and 1000 hours).
About the cable itself:
It's very well built and has a solid construction. It's slightly microphonic when it scratches against a table or something but it doesn't bother me at all. It's very flexible (more than G52 was but not as flexible as Headphile V2) so it's quite easy to handle. The purple color isn't for everybody but I think it looks cool. You can choose a different color if you want, just mention about it when you order the cable. At least that's what akwok said earlier.
About the sound:
I switched back to the stock cable today and the differences were what I expected them to be. First of all the stock cable has more muffled sound with less separation and clarity. RAL with its silver construction brings you all the details and sparkles from the tracks without losing anything. The feeling of muffled sound gets stronger due to the more overwhelming bass with the stock cable. With RAL there's less bass but it has better quality. It's faster, tighter and in better control. Silver usually has this effect to bass and so it is with RAL also.
People often say that silver might make the sound too bright and revealing and so lead to fatiguing sound. That's not the case with RAL. I've never had to take off the headphones because of getting fatigued, sibilance or anything like that. Sound is still very enjoyable without any annoying peaks in the highest tones.
With the stock cable, the sound is more in my head. With RAL the soundstage opens up nicely and there's more space and air in the sound. I also have this feeling of more coherent sound with RAL than with the stock cable. It's like there's something missing when I use the stock cable now.
So overall I'm very pleased with RAL and I have no regrets paying the $199 price for it. It's not even a bad price compared to many other manufacturers. You get a 2 meter long cable with that price.

So I hope this helps you people looking for an upgrade cable for HD650. I really think that RAL belongs to the same class with "the legendary" Equinox, ZU and Moon Audio products (and RnB G52).