barondla
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2009
- Posts
- 1,442
- Likes
- 1,527
Yes, the filters affect the sound of anything plugged into the 3.5mm jack.Do the digital filters affect the sound at all with headphones directly connected to the 3.5mm jack?
Yes, the filters affect the sound of anything plugged into the 3.5mm jack.Do the digital filters affect the sound at all with headphones directly connected to the 3.5mm jack?
Not hearing it here. What format are you using? FLACS are perfectly gapless here. There is no gap and there is no glitch.Gapless isn't perfect on the m0. There is a slight glitch between tracks and the timing is thrown off slightly but noticeably. My tracks are ripped perfectly gapless by foobar and play fine on my phones and other gapless enabled players. Any chance of a fix?
Try again after the new one has been used for a couple of hundred hours.I have two M0s, one bought months back and a newer one given as a Christmas present to me just recently. The new one is running 2.3 and the older one 2.2 firmware. There are physical differences between the two, the newer having a darker Titanium color than the other and the corners a bit more angular. That's not where the differences end, though. I've noticed the newer one having more muddled sound than the first. I've done a comparison between the two using the same music files and with the same headphones. The newer one has more bass but simultaneously more congested as well.
Is the sonical differences that I'm hearing due to firmware, burn in-related or did you alter the sound signature with newer M0s? The difference is pretty obvious. I must say I like the older revision's sound characteristics a lot more. The newer one sounds considerably more congested as I stated before. Will burn-in help some?
MP3 and AAC. My files play perfectly gaplessly on my phone apps and other daps.Not hearing it here. What format are you using? FLACS are perfectly gapless here. There is no gap and there is no glitch.
I can confirm it. Using FLAC files. Sometimes new song starts from the end of the previous one on the album, sometimes it starts few seconds later from the actual start of the song.Not hearing it here. What format are you using? FLACS are perfectly gapless here. There is no gap and there is no glitch.
I have quite a few DJ mixed albums and the slight glitch and timing difference is noticeable because rhythm and timing are very important in dance music.I can confirm it. Using FLAC files. Sometimes new song starts from the end of the previous one on the album, sometimes it starts few seconds later from the actual start of the song.
Listening mostly whole library in shuffle mode, so it very noticable when such things happens.
The time on mine has gotten out of sync at least twice - not sure yet why as I only really notice it when I'm in the gym (I use the device to track the time, while I'm there).
Could very well be battery related, where dead battery = time gets out of whack. Easy enough fix though.
Gapless doesn't apply in shuffle mode. It only works when playing an album in the correct order.I can confirm it. Using FLAC files. Sometimes new song starts from the end of the previous one on the album, sometimes it starts few seconds later from the actual start of the song.
Listening mostly whole library in shuffle mode, so it very noticable when such things happens.
Well, if it's got no power, what's suppose to keep the clock running?
What I have noticed, though, is that the RTC on mine isn't as accurate as a quartz clock should be (especially for audio purposes), gaining at least a second per day. I've got 2 automatic Seikos that have roughly the same accuracy
I think they may have tinkered with the SQ with the 2.3 update. Sound is noticeably worse than with 2.2.Try again after the new one has been used for a couple of hundred hours.
Well, if it's got no power, what's suppose to keep the clock running?
What I have noticed, though, is that the RTC on mine isn't as accurate as a quartz clock should be (especially for audio purposes), gaining at least a second per day. I've got 2 automatic Seikos that have roughly the same accuracy
+1I think they may have tinkered with the SQ with the 2.3 update. Sound is noticeably worse than with 2.2.
@Shanling Please undo the sound revisions!