Sensitivity of phones
Sep 6, 2008 at 1:39 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 10

ljcii

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 3, 2008
Posts
450
Likes
10
i read on a sennheiser product
"The high sensitivity of this products reveals every detail"
Is that true? The sensitivity being high, other than being able to pick up hiss, less power also picks up the minute minute details of music that others with low sensitivty are not able to pick up even when they turn up their volume high?
 
Sep 6, 2008 at 1:50 PM Post #2 of 10
Quote:

Originally Posted by ljcii /img/forum/go_quote.gif
i read on a sennheiser product
"The high sensitivity of this products reveals every detail"
Is that true? The sensitivity being high, other than being able to pick up hiss, less power also picks up the minute minute details of music that others with low sensitivty are not able to pick up even when they turn up their volume high?



In this thread is some explanation about sensitivity and so on:
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f4/cne...report-360717/

Here's a very good post from Cool_Torpedo from that thread:

"Many other members and I have covered this topic in other threads. Impedance is just one of the factors that we have to consider to foresee how demanding on an amp or HP output a pair of cans is.

It's true that impedance on AC is not the very same as resistance on DC, but considering that many HPs have quite flat impedance curves across the frequency response, with flat phase angles, it's quite safe equaling them when speaking of HPs.
Looking at things this way, it's also true that the higher the impedance the phones have, the more opposition they present against the current flow, so they seem to be needing more power. But this is not the whole picture. You need to see the heapdhone as a mechanical transducer which asks for electrical power to produce sound pressure level. And here is when sensitivity comes into play.

Sensitivity tells you how loud the phones will sound when applying a mW of power on them. If you have very sensitive headphones, something like 115dB/mW, it doesn't matter what's their impedance, with very little power they'll sound loud and quite good. The higher is their impedance, the less current intensity they'll ask from the output, so they can be even easier to drive than an equally sensitive pair of phones having lower impedance. Remember that power is a function of Voltage and current Intensity. More impedance asks for more voltage being all things equal. The reason why most IEMs don't need an amp to sound good is not their lowish impedance, is their high sensitivity which in most cases is well above 110dB/mW. But this high sensitivity has its tradeoff, which is that very low voltage signals, like hums and noises in the source, will be clearly heard.

As long as the sensitivity of the phones goes decreasing, you need more power to make them sound equally loud. Exactly the double of power for every 3dB you decrease the sensitivity. Hence phones rated at 97dB/mW will need 64 mW to sound at 115 dB, while the cans having that 115dB/mW sensitivity need just one miliwatt! To make matters worse, if those cans at 97dB/mW are low impedance, they'd be asking for that power more in the form of current Intensity than in voltage form.

If that's clear, then it's quite easy to understand that impedance means nothing alone, since also sensitivity should be considered, and that having a combination of low impedance and low sensitivity, is quite demanding on the power source"

But there are many other threads on this topic as well.
 
Oct 6, 2008 at 1:33 PM Post #3 of 10
I was under the impression that every 3 dB was a doubling of intensity and every 6 decibels was a doubling of loudness (and doubling of power). So a 97db/mw phone would need 8mW to sound 115 right?
What exactly is "current intensity"? I take it you use that interchangeably with coulombs/sec (amperes).

Thanks for the clarification,
Dave
 
Oct 6, 2008 at 3:06 PM Post #4 of 10
How about sensitivity measured in Volts (V), rather than milliWatt (mW)?

Like my Stax SR-007BL which are rated: Quote:

Sensitivity : 100 dB / 100 V r.m.s.


 
Oct 6, 2008 at 6:40 PM Post #6 of 10
Quoting something doesn't mean that I understand it. I don't
icon10.gif
 
Nov 2, 2008 at 2:14 AM Post #8 of 10
to sum it up in lay-man's word: sensitivity plays dominant role in determining the perceived loudness...

SHURE SE-530 with 119 dB/mW-Impedance 36 Ohm will be louder than PHILIPS SHE-9850 with 115 dB/mW-Impedance 12 Ohm with the same source and volume level?
 
Nov 3, 2008 at 7:44 AM Post #9 of 10
Quote:

Originally Posted by krmathis /img/forum/go_quote.gif
How about sensitivity measured in Volts (V), rather than milliWatt (mW)?

Like my Stax SR-007BL which are rated:




you can do the math, square of the volts count in R.M.S (because the signals are AC)divided by the resistances of the phone
 
Nov 3, 2008 at 10:14 AM Post #10 of 10
Quote:

Originally Posted by knights /img/forum/go_quote.gif
to sum it up in lay-man's word: sensitivity plays dominant role in determining the perceived loudness...

SHURE SE-530 with 119 dB/mW-Impedance 36 Ohm will be louder than PHILIPS SHE-9850 with 115 dB/mW-Impedance 12 Ohm with the same source and volume level?



Mm. Are you asking a question here?
Anyway, if you aren't, I know that. But I think you guys got me wrong.
The thing is that on the description of the sennheiser IE 8, it mentions that "the high sensitivity ensures that you can hear every single detail"
From what i know, don't sensitivity only affect volume? Since when did it produce more detail.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top