Sennheiser Profit Margin
Mar 15, 2006 at 11:19 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 47

mikeblas

New Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 5, 2006
Posts
39
Likes
0
Looks like Sennheiser HD-600's retail for $350. I think you can find 'em for about $300 without trying too hard.

What do you think Sennheiser's cost to manufacture them is? What is their profit margin?
 
Mar 16, 2006 at 5:20 PM Post #4 of 47
Quote:

Originally Posted by rickcr42
wrong forum.belongs in "headphones"


Oops! I guess I'll have to rely on a moderator rescuing me, as I don't appear to have the priveleges required to move my own thread.
 
Mar 16, 2006 at 5:38 PM Post #6 of 47
I got the HD650 for 290 dollars without trying hard. i'm sure they cost them about 80-90 in total.
 
Mar 16, 2006 at 11:44 PM Post #8 of 47
Quote:

as I don't appear to have the priveleges required to move my own thread.


me either though there was a time...................
very_evil_smiley.gif
 
Mar 17, 2006 at 12:41 AM Post #9 of 47
Define profit margin. On the one thing i'm sure they make quite a bit from the 580 600 and 650s regarding gross profit. But then That series would have quite a bit of R&D to recover. I suppose one could always grab their stock sheets and check but that would not give you a breakdown of headphones, just of total business.
 
Mar 17, 2006 at 11:37 AM Post #10 of 47
The actual raw cost of parts would be pretty low, as the thing is made
mostly from injection moulded parts.
Obviously you also have to consider assembly costs,but everything is
designed to click together with little apparent tweaking or fettling.
Sennhieser headphones do seem to be slick assembly line designs.
I would not be surprised if they cost around $30 to make.



.
 
Mar 17, 2006 at 12:30 PM Post #11 of 47
I think they have to throw a lot of mismatched drivers away which makes it take more time.... I.e. if they don't follow specs they should be thrown out. Maybe that is one reason why the HD25-1 costs what it costs (120 dB SPL, tested by some other website to 138 dB SPL).
More of the profit lies on the replacement parts, not that it is cheap to keep that much stock, but.....

EDIT: Apparantly this was true with the AKG K1000 and is why it is discontinued - too many mismatched drivers + Harman = discontinued.

EDIT: There's profit marking on anything - right now TFTs are grossly overpriced. It costs about $10 to make a 1400x1050 14" TFT, which sells for $700. This is the LCD display only. Imagine the gross markup on 32" LCD tvs with a lower resolution
biggrin.gif
 
Mar 17, 2006 at 12:43 PM Post #12 of 47
Quote:

Originally Posted by Daroid
I think they have to throw a lot of mismatched drivers away which makes it take more time.... I.e. if they don't follow specs they should be thrown out. Maybe that is one reason why the HD25-1 costs what it costs (120 dB SPL, tested by some other website to 138 dB SPL).
More of the profit lies on the replacement parts, not that it is cheap to keep that much stock, but.....

EDIT: Apparantly this was true with the AKG K1000 and is why it is discontinued - too many mismatched drivers + Harman = discontinued.

EDIT: There's profit marking on anything - right now TFTs are grossly overpriced. It costs about $10 to make a 1400x1050 14" TFT, which sells for $700. This is the LCD display only. Imagine the gross markup on 32" LCD tvs with a lower resolution
biggrin.gif



yes but the complexity of building an LCD compared to a headphone is very different... LCD's are much much harder to make also...
 
Mar 17, 2006 at 12:49 PM Post #13 of 47
Quote:

Originally Posted by Daroid
I think they have to throw a lot of mismatched drivers away which makes it take more time.... I.e. if they don't follow specs they should be thrown out. Maybe that is one reason why the HD25-1 costs what it costs (120 dB SPL, tested by some other website to 138 dB SPL).
More of the profit lies on the replacement parts, not that it is cheap to keep that much stock, but.....

EDIT: Apparantly this was true with the AKG K1000 and is why it is discontinued - too many mismatched drivers + Harman = discontinued.

EDIT: There's profit marking on anything - right now TFTs are grossly overpriced. It costs about $10 to make a 1400x1050 14" TFT, which sells for $700. This is the LCD display only. Imagine the gross markup on 32" LCD tvs with a lower resolution
biggrin.gif



I would expect Sennhieser to have manufacturing consistently performing
drivers down to a fine art, considering how long they have been in the
business.
Most of the chosen price points would be calculated on the expectations of
the target market as what to they would expect pay for the given
performance level of the product in relation to the competition.
People expect to pay for the 'best', but not too much.

I suspect Sennhieser has quite a bit of room for maneuver with product
pricing compared to say, Grado.



.
 
Mar 17, 2006 at 2:35 PM Post #14 of 47
Grado uses both injection moulded parts and incredibly inexpensive metals and woods in their construction. The "hand made" aspect doesn't really mean as much as you think it does, either, except perhaps on the RS-2 and RS-1 (and you see where that gets us, with the most recent ones). They're both making quite a lot of cash on each sale, and have likely long ago recouped their R&D costs and are now profiting solely.
 
Mar 17, 2006 at 5:06 PM Post #15 of 47
LCDs are mass production, zero human interaction - and still have fewer and fewer dead pixels. People still buy at inflated prices, and LCDs for HDTVs are so low-res per area that the price does not make any sense.

Yes, the demand sets the price basically, headphones don't cost that much to make, but i think regardless of brand, throwing out drivers happen often, considering people still get (pricey) off balance headphones. They are assembled by hand (or are they?), so that would maybe drag up the price somewhat. I'd say HD580/6XX would cost about $40 to make+freight, you do the rest of the math
smily_headphones1.gif
It is just a guess judging by the materials.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top