Sennheiser HD555/M-Audio Transit duo review

Oct 6, 2004 at 1:54 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 12

GeekMystique

New Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 13, 2004
Posts
8
Likes
0
I thought it was about time I gave something back to these forums. After enjoying them for about a month I'll review both my HD-555 and M-Audio Transit USB. I can't really disconnect these two since i bought them at the same time and am almost constantly pairing them.

My background: I am not much of an audiophile, but I am very much into listening music. My ears are pretty sensitive and I can discern sources pretty easily, I'm just looking for satisfaction, which doesn't have to be perfection in my book.

All music i listen to is compressed, so you could call me an audio butcher. When I download my music i always try to download the best rips though. I hate listening to anything below 192 KBit and prefer music above that.

My musical tastes are pretty much all over the map. I enjoy Dr. Dre, Bjork, Elvis Costello, Gangstarr, RATM, Radiohead, Stevie Wonder, Two Lone Swordsmen, Curtis Mayfield, whatever, all depending on my mood. The only things I'm not quite ready for are classical and jazz.

My previous setup was a SBLive value card coupled with a open (~$50) Sony HD480 headphone. Now before i heard any 'real' headphones i thought the Sony was pretty decent, you could turn up the volume on it without distortion, and it had plenty of bass and highs. I did notice however, that connecting it to my mainboard's onboard soundcard produced a crisper sound (more well defined in low and high ranges, not as nasal as the sblive). Unfortunately this crisper sound was paired with pretty audible noise levels, also the drivers were buggy sometimes, so i mostly resorted to my SBLive.

--------------
The actual HD555 review

The build quality of the HD555 pleasantly surprised me. It's a very solid design, but the headband is very soft and flexible. They also look better on your head (in normal people's language that would be 'slightly less dumb'), not the two big round halves of my previous sony's, a flat lean fit. They are pretty heavy compared the cheap piece of plastic Sony, and I do notice them on my head more. This said I think nothing compares to the cosily stuffed light as a breeze open air cheap-sony series.

The cable is very nice and thick, yet flexible. It regrettably ends in a large stereo plug which is useless for my purposes, but comes with an adapter plug (although of the 'pull-the-cable-and-take-the-audio-jack-with-it' variety).

When connecting the headphones at first I thought the cable was broken, because one channel would drop out any time i moved the cable. After troubleshooting it turned out the earlier described Sennheiser plug adapter was too loose. I was already planning on getting a cable-based adapter, so I took the libery of getting it earlier. I find it deplorable Sennheiser supplied me with a dud (and dangerous) cable adapter, especially since most people use devices with small jacks nowadays.

I was pleasantly surprised by how easily the HD555's were driven. All my soundcards drove the headphones to levels you could use them as speakers. Compared to my very easily driven CD480 set i think they need about 25-35% more juice to produce the same pressure. My beloved Iriver imp400 could drive it to reasonably acceptable levels (although not rock-out loud). I might still get a cheap amp in the future, as higher powered sources are believed to change the sound signature of headphones by some. Right now I just think the risk of buying an amp and coming to the conclusion the sound is not better only possibly louder is too big. The only real reason to get an amp would be portable use.

And now... The sound!
First off: This is a kind of comparison between the HD555 sound, compared to my old CD480's and 'what i should think my audio should sound like'. I just conducted the last test to confirm my earlier observations (for those who believe in burn-in). They have had about 100 hours of playing on moderate-to-higher volume levels. All observations are made on my M-Audio Transit with no equalization and Winamp with the MAD MP3 plugin.

The definition of sound is uncomparable to my old headphones. The stereo image created is wider and more detailed. The dynamic range of my music seems to have increased, echo effects used can easily be picked apart and small stereo details appear. Sadly they also highlight some of the crappier studio efforts I have on my harddrive. Underground hip hop sounds lo-fi even more than it did, and Garbage sounds more like garbage. This is of course in favor of these phones.

Bass is most certainly strong. The detail is also very nice, instead of having my ears monotomously tremble i now have more shades of bass. This new bass definition is a big plus for the techno/drum and bass music I play, although it can take the fake chrome shine of records like Dr. Dre's 'The Chronic'.

The only sonic complaint i have against the HD555s is the mids. I've noticed tones, especially hi-hats and the whitenoisesque 'lisp' sound some singers make can slight somewhat nasal and overpowered. Aimee Mann's 'singing' voice and Beck's Sea Change record suffered considerably from this. This might be attributed by the frequency response characteristics of MP3 as well. I do have the feeling the mids have slightly recessed after my hours of use, but whether this is due to mental or physical burn-in remains to be seen. Also, maybe the sonic changes an amp would bring could make a difference here?

Highs are very nice and adequately strong. Especially with my OGG and MPC compressed songs. The highs contribute a lot to the wide and more defined sound i described earlier.

I find these phones suitable for most of my music. Because of the neutral sound I do believe you should definitely not buy them for 'rocking out' with Rage Against the Machine or Nirvana. These songs do sound good but they are a little too contained for my liking.

Apart from the spike in the mids and crappy plug adapter I have no complaints against the Sennheiser HD555, i have the feeling i got a little more than what i paid for (115 Euros), which is definitely not what you'd expect when buying high profile brands.

In my utterly subjective rating system these headphones get an overall A-. sonically they get a B+, because i still think there could be improvement made (maybe in sources or due to burn-in).

--------------
M-Audio Transit USB

I bought a second hand M-Audio Transit USB audio adapter to compliment my new headphone aquisition.

The things I was most cautious of were the output power of the device and it's USB interface/drivers. Both concerns proved unneeded.

The output power of the M-Audio could easily power my HD555 to ear damaging levels. Although not as strong (~20% difference) as my SBLive it's still enough to drive any headphone you'd reasonable want to connect unamped. I downloaded the latest drivers and installed it (i never use cd's) and there were no problems in getting it to work. I've also done some gaming on it and it works flawless. Of course no 3D hardware acceleration whatsoever, but also no cracks or pops which I do get with an older USB audio solution i have.

As i described before, i found that my SBLive's output was worse than my noisy onboard soundcard in terms of the crispness and detail in sound. The M-Audio provided the crispness of the onboard sound without any noise. And when i say without noise i mean without noise, there was NO noise at all, no matter how high the output level. I have the liberty to use Transit in a quiet room on my silent thinkpad laptop, and I have zero complaints about its sound. It's strong, uncolored, undistorted and unforgiving.

The device has native 24 bit 96Khz audio support. Apart from the fact I really doubt i could personally hear the difference (knowing the scientific basis of what these numbers mean), i have had no way to test it. It's still nice to know you're hype-ready though
wink.gif
.

I find the Transit to be a simple, no bells and whistles low budget solution that's perfect for my usage. I can connect it to my laptop when i go to work or am out on travel, and use it at home on my workstation, and it only cost me 50 euros including shipping (second hand). I love the thought of not having to sacrifice sound quality anywhere, and at this price and size this is a killer solution for that goal.

---------
I've already had a lot of pleasure from my small investment. The only deplorable thing is that never ever will sound the same again. When i pick up my old headphones they feel and sound like crap. I think i should not buy any better ones because i'd refuse to go to concerts or talk to people in real life.


Yours truly,
Geek Mystique
 
Oct 6, 2004 at 3:54 PM Post #3 of 12
Quote:

Originally Posted by GeekMystique
After troubleshooting it turned out the earlier described Sennheiser plug adapter was too loose.


My HD555 came with a bad plug adapter too. Sennheiser, some quality control please
wink.gif
 
Oct 6, 2004 at 4:19 PM Post #4 of 12
Yea interesting both my 555 and 497s came with a dodgy headphone plug.
frown.gif


If you have the money pick up an amp...it's not just about the volume. Everything will be pushed foward and tightened considerably. Guitars will be umm what's the word? More plucky? Lol. Percussion will be tighter and snappier, vocals will become more intelligible. A headsave go-vibe would be a great choice. Norm can add a dc power jack I believe.

Did you say how long they've burned in? Didn't see that, but they take 200+ hours to burn in all the way.
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Oct 6, 2004 at 8:58 PM Post #5 of 12
Wow, it's pretty amazing to hear both you guys got defective adapters as well, shame on Sennheiser. I'd rather have them get decent adapters with a non-gold finish, also, what point is the stupid gold finish if the internal connector plates are just normal metal (as i found out by attempting to fix the adapter).

Not that anyone uses these jack-killers for real purposes anyway...


And yes, i did 'burn them in' for ~100 hours although in my cases i was wearing the headphones constantly. I didn't really notice big differences, but i guess that's not really possible if you're growing into them while they're growing themselves.

I've got some old 70-80s amps lying around, i'll try connecting the 555s to those to check if an amp would make a worthy difference. I'm not really fond of spending ~$80 on $120 headphones, even if they might make the sound slightly better. The difference would have to be day-and-night. I doubt this will be the case seeing how easily driven these phones are. My most acceptable option would be getting a cheap $30 second hand cmoy, but i'm not sure if these pack the punch of the more expensive headphone amps.
 
Oct 7, 2004 at 5:39 AM Post #6 of 12
Geek,

Thanks for a cool review. Multiple components (and the synergy between the two) is nice to see in a review.

It's good to see that you're getting some satisfaction out of your hd555's. Those cans are much maligned around here lately...

Peace,

Graz
 
Oct 7, 2004 at 4:57 PM Post #7 of 12
Get a nice little amp for your Transit, you won't regret it. I use a SUperDual with mine and it make it sound all the better. Gives it a touch more authority, I like it a LOT.

Scott
 
Oct 7, 2004 at 5:18 PM Post #8 of 12
Nice review. I agree that a budget setup reviews are needed here.

As for my ears and the Transit at 24/48 vs. 24/88.2 or 96 I hear no difference with PPA + MS-2's. I took Wodgy's advice and don't upsample the signal when using Sonica or Transit. So far my Transit has beat both IBM (Crystal Sound) and Toshiba (SigmaTel Audio) onboard soundcards.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeekMystique
I've already had a lot of pleasure from my small investment. The only deplorable thing is that never ever will sound the same again. When i pick up my old headphones they feel and sound like crap. I think i should not buy any better ones because i'd refuse to go to concerts or talk to people in real life.


I had the same feelings.
tongue.gif


Now the next step is to get an amp in the near future.
cool.gif
 
Oct 7, 2004 at 6:38 PM Post #9 of 12
Quote:

Originally Posted by breez
My HD555 came with a bad plug adapter too. Sennheiser, some quality control please
wink.gif



My hd595 had broken adapter too, other channel was dead with the adapter. But it doesnt matter because i use the bigger plughead anyways.
 
Oct 7, 2004 at 7:45 PM Post #10 of 12
I've got some old 70-80s amps lying around, i'll try connecting the 555s to those to check if an amp would make a worthy difference. I'm not really fond of spending ~$80 on $120 headphones, even if they might make the sound slightly better. The difference would have to be day-and-night. I doubt this will be the case seeing how easily driven these phones are. My most acceptable option would be getting a cheap $30 second hand cmoy, but i'm not sure if these pack the punch of the more expensive headphone amps.[/QUOTE]


My HD-555's sound really great out of either of my old Luxman amps, and really not too bad out of an old Sansui 441 receiver that I got for $5.00. They have a nice expansive sound that is pretty good for most things - just a wee bit scratchy on the very top, and weak on the very bottom.
 
Oct 24, 2004 at 11:53 AM Post #11 of 12
I built a CMoy from a kit i bought from Marios a few days ago. It's a simple amp with no special bells or whistles.

In the first 'build' of my amp i didn't have a pot meter connected to it, but decided to put one on the output. The cmoy output seems to be high enough to accidentally damage my HD555's or hearing. After connecting a pot i was able to tame the output so i could do some test driving.

The soundstage of the HD555's is uncomparably different from the ampless sound out of my Transit USB. The bass is deeper, it packs more power, maybe at a slight cost in definition. The sound is much warmer, slightly coloured, maybe like 70's sound equipment. The mids are not as shrill as they were, and seem more defined and even, i hear more small details in this range. The higher spectrum retracted a few notches, it's still there but it's not as obvious.

I find the HD555's more pleasant sounding through the CMoy amp, i think especially first-time listeners would greatly pick the amped phones over non-amped. I do however find the amped sound less neutral, it's warm and definetely coloured.

I might do some tweaking with the cmoy to see if i can get the highs a little stronger, maybe by removing the capacitors on the input lines.

Anyway, i do now agree an amp can make a vast difference to the sound of easily driven headphones.

-GM
 
Oct 24, 2004 at 6:55 PM Post #12 of 12
Geek,

Fantastic review and addendum. This is exactly the kind of stuff I just love to find on Head-Fi, and unfortunately just don't see enough of. Reviews like this may eventually inspire me to review my own gear, which I believe falls into the "budget-fi" categeory, just like your own.

Thanks again for contributing a wonderful review to the forums.

Ciao,

-Chad
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top