mbd2884
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2005
- Posts
- 2,483
- Likes
- 17
I find it pretty annoying when a single band member uses the former band's name to sell. Very misleading.
Top examples:
Guns n Roses, but then I don't like Axel Rose anyways, arrogant sob. If all the original former members decided to leave because Axel is a dick, how is it still Guns n Roses? One member?
Lynrd Skynrd - This band should not exist, mostly because almost all the original members are dead. Truly pathetic how Johnny Van Zant continues to his brother's band's name. I mean what the hell? John wasn't even the lead singer of the original crew to begin with.
Anyone else know of bands similar and disgusted? It's misleading to the point when you look at Guns n Roses trying to gain publicity for their latest album. But... that's not Guns n Roses...
Top examples:
Guns n Roses, but then I don't like Axel Rose anyways, arrogant sob. If all the original former members decided to leave because Axel is a dick, how is it still Guns n Roses? One member?
Lynrd Skynrd - This band should not exist, mostly because almost all the original members are dead. Truly pathetic how Johnny Van Zant continues to his brother's band's name. I mean what the hell? John wasn't even the lead singer of the original crew to begin with.
Anyone else know of bands similar and disgusted? It's misleading to the point when you look at Guns n Roses trying to gain publicity for their latest album. But... that's not Guns n Roses...