Schiit Lyr Tube Rollers
Feb 11, 2018 at 3:59 PM Post #16,487 of 23,493
Feb 11, 2018 at 4:03 PM Post #16,489 of 23,493
Probably(?) Foton, then, esp. if the tube type is inside the rhombus. Do you have a pic with the symbol? Ah, I see the type printed there. No clue base on that photo.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Fot...357ZAhUBmuAKHVOGA1AQ_AUICigB&biw=1712&bih=925

All my Fotons are like that. My 1966 Foton 6N3Ps are fantastic. 6N8S (6SN7 equiv.) are pretty good, too, esp. for the money.[/QUOTE
From the ebay ad.
s-l1600111111.jpg
 
Feb 11, 2018 at 4:14 PM Post #16,492 of 23,493
But I would say others may have different preferences in sound from their tubes than you do from yours. That however does not make your preference right and theirs wrong.

You could use that argument to suggest that crap tubes that Schiit supplies with their headphone amps are actually good tubes. Sorry, but the consensus is that the Voshkod Rockets are not great tubes and certainly not better than the '74 or '75 Reflektors. Just because one person disagrees does not make the Voshkods great tubes all of a sudden. But you certainly are free to live in your kumbaya world where every tube is great to someone....
 
Feb 11, 2018 at 4:14 PM Post #16,493 of 23,493
Last edited:
Feb 11, 2018 at 4:23 PM Post #16,494 of 23,493
You could use that argument to suggest that crap tubes that Schiit supplies with their headphone amps are actually good tubes. Sorry, but the consensus is that the Voshkod Rockets are not great tubes and certainly not better than the '74 or '75 Reflektors. Just because one person disagrees does not make the Voshkods great tubes all of a sudden. But you certainly are free to live in your kumbaya world where every tube is great to someone....
I don't get you dude. 1 minute I really like you and value what you have to say, then this? But you certainly are free to live in your kumbaya world where every tube is great to someone....
It's like you have the biggest chip on your shoulder and it's the world according to winders.
 
Feb 11, 2018 at 5:22 PM Post #16,496 of 23,493
There is no symbol that I can see, except for the rhombus and OTK symbol.

Have seen those before, not sure if I actually have any here, but no symbol, only the script below the date.
Maybe that's the brand identifier instead of the usual logo?
Don't think they are Reflector or Oktyabr, at least the construction details do not match the RFL or OKT I've seen.
 
Feb 11, 2018 at 5:29 PM Post #16,497 of 23,493
Probably(?) Foton, then, esp. if the tube type is inside the rhombus. Do you have a pic with the symbol? Ah, I see the type printed there. No clue base on that photo.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Fot...357ZAhUBmuAKHVOGA1AQ_AUICigB&biw=1712&bih=925

All my Fotons are like that. My 1966 Foton 6N3Ps are fantastic. 6N8S (6SN7 equiv.) are pretty good, too, esp. for the money.

True that Foton uses the rhombus, but the rhombus is also used as a military inspection stamp, usually with a number inside, and randomly placed.
 
Feb 11, 2018 at 5:35 PM Post #16,498 of 23,493
True that Foton uses the rhombus, but the rhombus is also used as a military inspection stamp, usually with a number inside, and randomly placed.
Yes, that can be confusing. I did what I could to clarify :wink:
 
Feb 11, 2018 at 7:11 PM Post #16,499 of 23,493
All the tubes have a 3 in the rhombus, 3 have OTK8, 1 OTK6.
Sheet looks like a spec sheet for the tube with no symbols.
I have a few pairs of them, same year, they're unbranded, probably for military export. I posted about them as my first post in this thread last year. They're the exact same internally as the '75 Oktyabr I have. The spec sheet is the same too.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top