Balthazar B
500+ Head-Fier
No.
Forgive me director, for I have sinned...
Or, let me be frank: as soon as I heard him blather on about how terrible a crime against humanity it would be to watch this on a tiny, pathetic home system simply because, horror of horrors, the studio had forsaken his superior vision by allowing it to be, my gawsh and glory, streamed on the same day it hit the theaters, I knew the movie was at best mediocre*, perhaps worth seeing once, but no better, since any great piece of popular art—and, let's face it, science fiction is the pop art of pop art, whether couched in terms of clanking mechanotopias or otherworldly metaverses or lands of magic and mysterious forces**—should be seen far and wide.
And so, yes, I have committed the grievous sin of demeaning this wondrous work by watching it on a lowly 4K JVC projector in a dedicated home theater room, with speakers and sound system tuned over years to produce better sound than I have ever heard in any theater—though of course my ears may be old and decrepit or hopelessly biased and unrefined—in a completely silent environment, alone in the best seat in the house, drinking a Falcone Syrah and eating a home-made wood-fired pizza. I am well and truly sorry for such a transgression.
Or, ah, not.
Here's the thing: maybe the director really believes that his movie is only truly experienced on a big screen, and he's only worried about people watching it on phones. But I found his attitude insulting and suspicious, since it aligns so well with the desire to (a) get people to theaters to make more money, and (b) limit exposure to the film so as to better control the review narrative.
And yeah, I'm biased, and I get it. But when I tell you to buy one Vidar, not two, or get headphones you like before buying any of our gear, I'm really hoping you understand this is the most honest advice you're going to get, because it steers money away from us, and acts counter to our interests.
*Mediocre is not necessarily an insult. I don't feel like I need my life back after watching Dune the Movie, 2021 Edition. Though I won't watch it again. And I really wonder what a Blade Runner Final Final Super Never Better Edition version of the 1984 Dune might be, if they cut the awful VO and maybe, just maybe toned the Harkonnens down a bit. We get it, they're baddies. The 2021 Edition did much better with them.
**I see fantasy as being basically a subset of SF, worlds in which nanotech has progressed so far (and then fallen) that unbelievable things can happen, and some can be activated only with the most arcane knowledge. Yes, I know, I am insane.
Final word: I do not envy anyone trying to take a book—especially a doorstop like Dune—and trying to make a movie out of it. A movie, at best, has about a novelette's worth of content in it (about 10K words). A typical novel will be 10X that. Dune is 25X that. Dune also relies hugely on exposition and internal dialogues, which are anathema in a show-don't-tell medium like movies. To make Dune really, really work as a movie, it would take a complete teardown of the novel—which would anger readers—to set up the conflicts in a real, relatable way. Think of Star Wars. The shooting starts immediately, and in a few minutes we have the big crazy looking masked dood with a breathing problem killing people who piss him off. How do you do something akin to that with Dune? How do you set up the Atreides/Harkonnen/Emperor conflict? I would argue that looking at how Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep was transmogrified to Blade Runner. Literally almost nothing remained from the book--not the dial-a-mood, not the weird religion, nothing but the idea of replicants. The movie is very, very different, but it set the tone for...holy hell, so much damn SF on the screen it's almost sickening. The city scenes in Altered Carbon could come right out of Blade Runner. That's 1982. Is there such failure of imagination we can't even dream something that looks different? Are we just reusing the 3D models from other movies? How did the 1984 Dune look so amazingly different and without referent, and today we get something that looks uninspired—but "big." Sigh.
There's very little in the way of memorable science fiction films, really, compared with the sheer volume over the years. Most of the ones that seem to last with me feel almost parenthetically science fiction. Children of Men, La Jetée, Ex Machina, Dark Star. The one scene in Robocop where Murphy experiences the memory his wife, and realizes who he is and all he's lost. The tears in the rain monologue in Blade Runner. I'd love to see what the Coen Brothers would make of The Sirens of Titan. That would be insane (and yeah, I know the Coens have stated they'll never adapt/direct a science fiction film).
Thanks for your thoughtful riff on the Dune thing. I'm not sure Dune can be successfully made into a film true to the book (any more than, say, Gravity's Rainbow could). Haven't seen the new iteration yet, but the '84 version was just a postmodern mess. Maybe it would work better adapted as a comedy, or a musical.
To get back to the Schiit, and speaking of tears, I'd love to have something suitable and monoblocky to insert between the Freya+ and the rather-challenging-to-drive Gallo Ref speakers. Oh, and that'll pass the WAF hurdle.
Last edited: