I understand that class A is harder to get the same wattage out of than something like class A/B, I understand what makes a pure class A amp more expensive then a different more efficient topology. You cvan show me expensive class a amps but we know thats not what Schiit does, They make what was expensive relativity reasonable. Which is why I am thrown I guess. Is 10 or 20 watts in class A louder than 10 or 20 watts of class A/B? Watts is watts right? Thats what is losing me. I guess when I see the amp I see something that will power a nice set of bookshelf speakers and could sounds really great doing it, but not really much else. I feel like Im missing a piece to the puzzle here and I want to know what it is. I know Schiit makes great stuff and usually when I see a product they release I can be like oh yeah thats cool, but honesty this is throwing me. I mean its cool but I dont understand why its a big deal. Unless you are telling me that we have gotten too caught up in power number and we are grossly overpowering out speakers..which I could definitely believe.
again this not not me hating or being argumentative or anything like that. I just really dont understand hype. Which may not be surprising because the extent of my speaker and amp buying is for home theater. I was never all that into a straight stereo setup, that was what my headphones were for. Lately though Ive been wanting to do a 2 channel setup in my living room for a turntable so in trying to figure this all out.
I'll try and give a reasonably simplified outline that hits on a few key facts:
Class-A operation has the key virtue of producing much lower levels of certain types of distortions, and essentially none of other types of distortion (such as cross-over distortions) as compared with other classes of operation such as the commonly employed Class-AB operation.
In Class-A operation, a very steady draw of averaged current is drawn from the power supply at all times. In contrast, an amplifier running in, for example, Class-AB operation draws widely varying amounts of current from the power supply in-step with the waveform of the signal (music) being amplified. The Class-AB amplifier effectively 'modulates' the power-supply circuitry itself, and various types of distortions can thereby be produced.
Also: In a Class-A amplifier, the amplification device/s (tube or transistor) are always 'turned-on", and every output tube or transistor amplifies a full 360 degrees of the wave cycle. Class-AB amplifiers, in contrast, must divide the full wave cycle between complementary pair/s of amplifying devices (again, tubes of transistors) so that each half-side of this complimentary pair only amplifies *less* than 360 degrees of the full wave cycle (usually just a little over half of the wave cycle) and then "handing off'' the amplification of the remainder of the wave cycle amplification duties to the opposite device/s. A result of this process is that the amplification devices turn on-and-off during each wave cycle, and all types of amplifying devices (tubes or transistors) produce distortions in the regions of the wave cycle wherein the device is transitioning either on or off. This is commonly known as 'cross-over distortion'.
Although Class-A produces a lower level of distortion, the output devices effectively stay 'on' continuously, drawing a relatively heavy current, and so the maximum theoretical efficiency of Class-A amplifiers is much less than Class-AB amplifiers which draw much lower (lower quiescent and lower average) current. For a given rated output power, a Class-A amplifier will consume much more supply power than a Class-AB amplifier of the same audio power rating, and will always have to be considerably physically larger to handle this extra power consumption. Unfortunately, there are no clever ways that have yet been devised to effectively avoid this efficiency penalty.
Is it worth it? The positive difference in sound quality produced by well-designed Class-A amps is usually readily apparent subjectively -- the difference is generally not minor.
So.... we often end up deciding to take the efficiency loss and resultant cost-per-watt penalty in order to achieve the very clean and engaging sound reproduction of a Class-A amplifier. Fortunately, there are a good number of relatively high-sensitivity loudspeakers available these days, and so there really doesn't have to be a penalty in terms of maximum desired SPL in most listening environments.
An interesting example: Consider the Lamm Industries ML2.2 power amplifier. It is an all-tube Class-A single-ended mono-block amplifier (two are used as a stereo pair) which is rated at *only* 18-Watts-per-channel maximum output power. Various iterations of this amp have been continuously on the market for over 15 years, and many seasoned reviewers still consider such Lamm amplifiers to have few, if any, peers in terms of absolute quality of sound reproduction. Have a look at some of the prestigious awards and rave professional reviews associated with this *only* 18-WPC amplifier:
https://lammindustries.com/pages/power-amplifiers-ml2-2/
I hope the above provides a bit of insight and some helpful food for thought