ruthieandjohn
Stumbling towards enlightenment
(Formerly known as kayandjohn.)
What is the actual change that renders a Gungnir to become “Multibit?”
What is the actual change that renders a Gungnir to become “Multibit?”
The phrase from the Schiit site I don’t understand is “proprietary closed form digital filter...as in Yggdrasil.”It's a completely different design including different DAC chips. Best explained by the Schiit web site:
https://www.schiit.com/products/gungnir
No luck find a Gumby so far. Gumby's are out of stock at the Dutch distributor and doesn't know when the item will be restocked. It seems I can't order with other European distributors. Is there a way around this? Maybe I should just buy a Bimby instead? The new ones are quite close apparently to the Gumby. Has anyone compared them?
The phrase from the Schiit site I don’t understand is “proprietary closed form digital filter...as in Yggdrasil.”
Don't you have a background in Signal Processing, and you've not heard of something like this?The phrase from the Schiit site I don’t understand is “proprietary closed form digital filter...as in Yggdrasil.”
There has been much posted about this by Mike Moffatt @Baldr on Head-Fi. Suffice it to say it is a very different sort of digital filter that preserves 100% of the incoming signal rather than recreating some of it.The phrase from the Schiit site I don’t understand is “proprietary closed form digital filter...as in Yggdrasil.”
I have a bimby and a gumby, but I don’t typically compare between them. The bimby is for feeding my asgard 2 and lyr 2, and gumby is for the freya + 2 vidar, mainly to allow for more power for the magnepansI haven't compared directly, the Gumby is a balanced design and slightly more resolving than Bimby, which is SE only.
If you don't need (or want) balanced then Bimby should be fine ... I've read a lot of great impressions as well.
Both are upgradable, which is key.
I would be interested in the answer you get from Laura at Schiit. This seems too complicated.
I do have a background in signal processing (e.g. author of the Prentice-Hall textbook “Real Time Signal Processing.”). However, I do not understand what Schiit has done to create the Multibit version of their DACs.Don't you have a background in Signal Processing, and you've not heard of something like this?
I guess you want to understand it in more depth than what people here can just regurgitate what Mike said.I do have a background in signal processing (e.g. author of the Prentice-Hall textbook “Real Time Signal Processing.”). However, I do not understand what Schiit has done to create the Multibit version of their DACs.
In other words, I don’t know Schiit.
Maybe the answer is in “Schitt Happened.”
If I read it, then maybe I WILL know Schiit.
I recommend searching out @Baldr's posts. Albeit on a layman's level in these forums, he goes into quite a bit of depth about what they were able to do VS how a typical delta-sigma DAC recreates the analog signal.I do have a background in signal processing (e.g. author of the Prentice-Hall textbook “Real Time Signal Processing.”). However, I do not understand what Schiit has done to create the Multibit version of their DACs.
In other words, I don’t know Schiit.
Maybe the answer is in “Schitt Happened.”
If I read it, then maybe I WILL know Schiit.
I guess you want to understand it in more depth than what people here can just regurgitate what Mike said.
People quote Rob Watts all time, but it's just quotes. There's a difference between understanding vs just quoting something they have no clear understanding of.
I don't understand people being so thrilled with concepts they don't understand that was spat out by designers.