Separate names with a comma.
btw few said that the old biforst is kind of aggressive with dry mids , any comment on that people? i guess the Uber and USB gen 2 made a lot of changes ha?
the usb will probably make the only difference you'll actually hear
Uber analog board = improved dynamic swings & attack for me.
my CIEM the UM Mentor got really asome mid range , the female vocal there is very nice!! thats why i am picky about the mid range,
dynamic wise i am a treble head too, i know that this point is covered with the Uber :3
so how do you find the mid range? like the others? i remember reading your qst impression about the mid range, you didn't like it before? i guess the sound change with some burning ofc hehehe
Midrange has a hint a liquidity to it.
thanks again people :3 i will be joining this club soon ^^
According to this pretty comprehensive thread and discussion on DACs, it makes quite a bit of difference.
Brand new DARKO review of Bifrost Uber Gen 2 is out now.
Purrin reviews and comparisons rock my eyeballs!
My personal experience is that - unless you have heard recent $1,000 and up DACs, you will not find a sound quality deficiency that you can attribute to the Bifrost Uber with 2nd Gen USB, because you will not have a reference point. In other words, nothing wrong jumps out at you....
Can anyone compare the Bifrost Uper + USB Gen 2 with Cocero HD? i am between both atm
Yes, you can find that comparison at: