Jun 25, 2005 at 2:38 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 43

ayt999

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Mar 19, 2004
Posts
3,796
Likes
14
a few hours ago we wrapped up a small meet at my home. NeilPeart and Scrith came up here from San Jose & Redwood City to do a few comparisons, mainly of balanced amplifiers. they arrived around 8PM and the meet basically went nonstop until ater 3AM, with only a short break where we went out for dinner in between. thanks a lot guys for coming here. it went a lot later than expected so I hope that didn't cause any inconveniences. Santa Rosa is pretty out of the way for most Head-Fiers in the area. I know that NeilPeart is already at work (and it's only 6AM right now), basically going there directly after the meet. now that's some serious dedication. you are one crazy Head-Fier.
wink.gif



here's a basic description of the setup we used for the comparison. most of the stuff was mine, except mainly for Scrith's DAC1, Dynamight, one of the 010's, and the Black Dragon 010 cable.

Accuphase DP-85 as the main source
Benchmark DAC1 used to compare to the DP-85

balanced dynamic headphones:
my 010 with blue pads
Scrith's 010 with red pads
HD650
PS1

balanced headphone cables:
moon audio Black Dragon 010 cable
24AWG solid silver HD650 cable
24AWG solid silver 010 cable
30AWG solid silver-plated copper 010 cable
30AWG solid silver-plated copper cable soldered directly to the PS1

other headphones:
HE90
SR-007
MDR-R10
HP2 with ultra-wide bandwith cable
ATH-L3000

balanced dynamic amps:
SinglePower SDS-XLR
HeadRoom BlockHead w/ 2004 modules
HeadAmp Gilmore Balanced Reference
sft-audio Dynamight

other amps:
HeadAmp Blue Hawaii
audio-technica AT-DHA3000

(I hope I didn't miss anything)


I'll do the impressions and other stuff later on.... hopefully Scrith and NeilPeart will join in shortly, with pictures since I don't feel like uploading photos on this dial-up connection.
tongue.gif
 
Jun 25, 2005 at 8:25 PM Post #2 of 43
Thanks ayt999 for another great mini-meet. Your equipment is amazing and provides NeilPeart and I a chance to carefully compare several components that otherwise we would probably never see or hear.

Only a couple of details to add to ayt999's information: the Dynamight was connected to the DAC1 (and later directly to the DP-85) with Cardas Golden Reference XLR 0.5m interconnects. Pretty much everything was plugged in using PS Audio (or Singlepower) power cables (and, on the DAC1, the ground pin had pin disconnected). A few items (the DP-85?) were plugged into a PS Audio P300. The Dynamight was connected directly to the wall via the PS Audio Plus power cables I brought.

OK, my impressions. All of these are just my opinions! I am sure there are head-fiers that would have gotten the exact opposite impressions that I did...what I say below is based on how I feel about what I heard.

Our first major test was a comparison between the Accuphase DP-85 and the Benchmark DAC1 (both feeding the Dynamight via XLR cables, with a very nice switch on the front of the SFT Audio Dynamight being used to switch between them). We conducted a number of blind tests for all three of us. My impression was that the DAC1 was surprisingly clear and strong, whereas the DP-85 smoothed things out a bit. I think if strong, clear bass and detailed highs are important to you, you might prefer the DAC1. For a smooth, warm midrange, the DP-85 might be your preference. For me, I don't think there is a clear winner...it probably depends on the type of music I'm listening to. This was not the result I expected (I figured the DAC1 would be trounced by the DP-85), so for now I think I'll be happy with my (relative to the rest of my system) reasonably priced DAC1 as a source.

Next came some comparisons between the extremely impressive-looking Singlepower Supra SDS XLR and the wonderfully restrained yet attractive SFT Audio Dynamight. I found comparing the sound of these two amps a bit difficult, because there are so many sound-influencing settings on the Singlepower amp (a "Qualia" mode, a standard mode with a bit of bass boost, and another mode with a Solen Stage 3 bypass...by the way, I might not have these descriptions exactly right); so part of the challenge was just finding the preferred configuration (for each of us) with the Singlepower amp. I think I settled on the standard mode (which has a bit of bass boost, ayt999 says).

Anyway, back to the Dynamight/Singlepower comparison...the Dynamight has something very special that I didn't hear with any other amps: extreme power with a high degree of clarity, a punch to every note (particularly percussion). This worked wonders with just about every headphone we tried, whether balanced or unbalanced (Qualia 010 balanced, Grado PS-1 balanced, HD650 balanced, R-10 unbalanced, Grado HP2 unbalanced, Audio Technica L3000 unbalanced). On the other hand, the bass on the Singlepower (and a general smoothness, though not nearly as pronounced as I expected from an amplifier with so many tubes sticking out of it) was amazing. And here is the quandry...yes, the low bass on the Singlepower was more pronounced (louder), but was this just the bass boost I was hearing? I don't know. I wonder what the Dynamight would have sounded like if we did some digitial equalization to increase the bass a bit? Again, this is confusing, because the bass on the Dynamight is definitely extremely strong and clear (indeed, with even more punch than the Singlepower, to my ears). But it wasn't as obvious.

The bottom line is: the Singlepower amp is amazing. But the Dynamight held its own, and in some ways seemed clearer and more authoritative in the presentation of percussive instruments. The Singlepower changed the sound a bit (generally in a good way) and sounded very strong, but the Dynamight hammered out (with astonishing force) the sound in its original form in a very inspiring, appealing way.

For these two amps, it came down to headphones: on the Qualia, an amazingly detailed headphone (in both bass and highs...more on the 'phones later) the Dynamight just built on its strengths. On the Sony R-10, which is clearly lacking in bass response, the Singlepower amp allowed it to blossom down there. The HD650 sounded very good on everything, I thought (though generally outclassed by the amazing assortment of headphones we had available to us). The bass of the Grado PS1 was a bit too much with the Singlepower amp, however (but, wow, did it sound mean with the Dynamight).

We also spent some time listening to the Headroom Blockhead with stepped attenuators. To my ears, this was the most disappointing amp...the Singlepower and Dynamight were clearly better sounding on all but the HD650, where the Blockhead does a fairly good job of building on the strengths of the balanced Sennheiser. The Blockhead is surely an amazing amp, and perhaps the new version will be even better. But the Singlepower monster and the Dynamight sounded better, to my ears.

The Gilmore Reference balanced amp was very nice, but the newer Gilmore design of the Dynamight was clearly better, so we didn't spend much time listening to it.

One of the big suprises of the meet (on which everyone agreed, I believe) was the Moon Audio balanced Black Dragon cable, which improved the Qualia headphones (both of them...yes, we tried it on both Qualias in attendance to make sure it was the cable) in a very noticeable ways: much fuller, more pleasant sound, and perhaps a very, very slight attenuation of the extreme highs. We compared the Black Dragon to a couple of ayt999's homemade balanced Qualia cables (all very nicely made, with excellent Neutrik connectors, carefully selected wire, and built with a time-consuming braiding technique); against the silver/copper cable the Black Dragon was instantly recognizable as sounding much nicer, against the silver I felt it was better, though the highs in the silver seemed quite detailed. I think ayt999 is going to be purchasing a Black Dragon cable now that he has heard it.
smily_headphones1.gif


OK, on to the headphones. I've already heard most of these at various other meets at ayt999 and NeilPeart's places and left my impressions here at head-fi, but here we go again (with some new insights from the two new amazing amps):

Sony Qualia 010 (balanced) - the best bass in any headphone, hands down (not in terms of overpowering bass, but rather in the amazing presentation of perfectly clear bass at what seems to be appropriate levels; certain songs just make it obvious that the Qualia is unmatched in the bass department, which continues to amaze NeilPeart when I point it out, who is highly enamored of the R-10 and HE90 'phones). Absolute crystal clarity in the highs (yes, even more so than the HE90). These two are so strong that it is not surprising to me at all that some people prefer other headphones, where the more familiar mids make them feel like they are in territory they have grown accustomed to over a long period of time. I like the Qualia, which is perfectly matched to SFT Audio's Dynamight. Again, I bring forth my analogy: listening to the Qualia after a years of HD650-like sound is going to make people feel very uncomfortable, much like people in a dark room when they come out into the sunlight. But, if you can spend the time (I suggest 1-2 weeks) to become accustomed to the amazingly brilliant and detailed Qualia sound (in both bass and highs), I think you will find that you can never go back to something as subdued and restrained as an HD650.

Sennheiser HE90 - what an amazing, sweet headphone. This is definitely the kind of headphone I could listen to for very, very long stretches of blissful musical enjoyment. But...it is not perfect. The bass is lacking. And the highs do not have quite the clarity and punch of the Qualia. Would I trade my the sound of a Qualia/Dynamight combo for the HE90/BlueHawaii? I don't know. They are different. Both are wonderful. Both have strengths (and weaknesses) that the other does not.

Sony R-10 - an amazing headphone that gives the HE90 a real run for its money...as long as you don't care about low bass, which is murky on this phone, and generally lacking. There is no question here for me on this...you hear it instantly, and you end up missing sound information on certain songs (with a strong low bass). For some types of music, however, this may be the ultimate headphone. After 10 minutes of glowing talk about the R-10 I pointed this out to NeilPeart with an example...and he was simply shocked. Yes, the bass is lacking...but the rest is so wonderful I think you tend not to notice it.

Grado PS1 (balanced) - astonishing bass. If you are a basshead, you must audition this headphone. On certain types of music, it may be unparalleled in this department. But, the mids are a bit metallic, and the highs lack punch (which reinforces the overwhelming bass). I don't think I could listen to it for extended periods...it just is not the headphone for me.

Grado HP2 - less bass than the PS1, so overall I think I enjoyed it more. But, again, there is a metallic, kind of dull sound to it. Not the headphone for me.

Sennheiser HD650 (balanced) - sweet mids. If you really like vocals, you may be satisfied with this headphone. But, compared to the other (ridiculously expensive) headphones I heard on this evening, I just can't enjoy it, because of the murky bass and veiled nature of the high frequencies.

Audio Technica L3000 - I didn't really like the sound of this headphone much, until I heard it powered by the matching Audio Technica amplifier/DAC. With the AT amp/DAC, suddently this headphone sounded quite good. I don't know the exact technical details, but having played around with digital equalization in Foobar2000, I was pretty sure that there was some sort of digital manipulation going on to make up for the weaknesses (or subdue the strengths) of the L3000. The bottom line is, it sounds very nice with the matching amp/DAC. But how would a Qualia or R-10 sound with an amp/DAC that had been carefully matched to them (with a potentially complex equalization algorithm being applied while the sound is still in digital form)? By the way, we listened to an R-10 connected to the AT amp/DAC and it still sounded better than the L3000 there, in my opinion (though not as good as it sounded when connected to the Singlepower amp).

That's it for now. I am sure the impressions left by ayt999 and NeilPeart will jar some memories, so there will probably be some follow-up posts with more feedback from me. Thanks ayt999 for supplying all the amazing equipment and our meeting place (and for dinner!). And thanks NeilPeart for your fine navigation skills that helped us get there (not!).
 
Jun 25, 2005 at 9:38 PM Post #5 of 43
I would like to know the price of the Dynamight considering it was able to hold its own against the SDS-XLR (I understand it was only one persons opinion). I checked SFT's website and it shows it as a custom build with no price listed.
 
Jun 25, 2005 at 10:49 PM Post #7 of 43
There should be some pictures soon.

Regarding SDS XLR vs. Dynamight...make no mistake, the SDS XLR is an amazing piece of equipment. My impressions were focused on the question "what would my setup sound like if I had purchased an even more expensive amp?" To find an analogy between the two amps, you might consider the SDS XLR as a 500 series SMG Mercedes with every possible option. The Dynamight is more like a Porsche 911. Cheaper than the SMG (though certainly not cheap), and definitely not as luxurious and dripping with amazing options, and perhaps even with a bit less horsepower. But, on some roads and at some times, the 911 is the better car for some people, no question.

I am hesitant to give a price for the Dynamight, because it has a lot of options and the deal was made over a period of time while it was in development (a process that lead to SFT finding ways to subtly enhance the basic Dynamight design, I believe). For now, let's say it started in the low 2000s and and ended up (after many small upgrades) in the high 2000s. The SDS XLR was significantly more expensive (especially when considering the cost of the tubes it uses).

I'll be bringing the Dynamight to the upcoming San Jose meet so some other people can hear it (and give their impressions here at head-fi, hopefully).

You can see my Dynamight at SFT's website in the section titled "Another Custom-built Dynamight" here.
 
Jun 26, 2005 at 2:07 AM Post #8 of 43
a few clarifications on the SDS-XLR:

the tubes used in the comparison were a pair of 6SN7W black bases followed by a quad of 1952 Bad Boys. this makes the amp sound more transparent than a 6SN7W / VT-231 combo, and brings out the strengths of the amp even more. the sound isn't that tubey and for the most part sounds much like a solid state amp, at least to me. I'm still messing around with the tubes so maybe I can find a better tube combo that will increase its performance even more. this is the combo that I like best so far with the 010.

as for the lack of the tubey sound I could have put in the TSRP's or something else, but since we were comparing it to the Dynamight and other SS amps, I went with the 6SN7W since that has a sound more like the SS amps (nevermind that it suited the 010's the best) and a better choice for the comparison IMO. the SDS-XLR with TSRP's have a sound more like a tube amp, but the performance of the 010 suffers.

the circuit with the Solen Stage III is the one that adds the bass and is the one that we used for the tests. the bass boost isn't that drastic though, only a slight increase IMO. the "normal" setting with them out of the circuit sounds slightly less refined (although it is still good and if the bass gets to be a bit too much is still a good way to use the SDS-XLR) so we didn't use it other than to hear the differences in the various SDS-XLR settings. this setting is probably only useful when using a balanced PS1 or something where the bass might get too overwhelming.

as for the other options on it, mine is pretty much maxed out except for the use of copper paper-in-oil capacitors rather than the silver paper-in-oil capacitors (more of a preference thing IMO, though the silver probably offers more transparency and might be better fit for comparison to the Dynamight. I'll have to try that option later I suppose.). the amp even has the LCD display with digital volume control option, although that wasn't used for the test.

for pricing, please contact SinglePower Audio (contact info listed at their website) and I'm sure they'll be happy to spec one out for you with the options you want.


connections between equipment:
PS Audio P300 plugged into the wall with a PS Audio Plus
DP-85 plugged into the P300 with a SinglePower power cord (continuous crystal pure copper)
DHA3000 plugged into the P300 with a PS Audio Plus
(all these ran at 100V since they are Japanese products)

Running Springs Audio Haley plugged into the wall with a PS Audio Plus
SDS-XLR plugged in with a SinglePower power cord (pure silver)
all the other gear plugged were in here with PS Audio Plus cables during the comparison.

XLR IC's used: HGA Silver Lace, PS Audio Statement, and one I made that is similar to the Silver Lace with the main difference being the use of 24AWG wire rather than 26AWG.


some comments for now (more to come later as I wake up and think more):

DP-85 versus DAC1:

I usually use my DP-85 at 100v and 100Hz, but for the meet it was running at 100v and 60Hz. the sound is smoother, more open, and more dynamic at 100Hz and I usually tend to like that more than at 60Hz. this might have been a reason why the DAC1 versus DP-85 comparison was much closer than what I remember from doing the same thing back when I was borrowing raif's DAC1 a few months ago. even running at the stock 100v and 60Hz, the DP-85 was smoother than the DAC1 and more relaxing to listen to and very musical. the DAC1 seemed more pronounced and the bass was more noticable than the DP-85. it was musical in its own way, though it definitely showed clarity that I would assume a professional product that was originally designed for studio use would have. the DP-85 is a high end consumer product thus its characteristics seemed to me more tuned for home enjoyment, and there definitely is an Accuphase sound to it that makes it slightly warm and inviting. the DP-85 is still very detailed, but the entire frequency range was very balanced (unlike the DAC1 where I noticed the bass and probably the high end more than the rest) and effortlessly put out. the sound is definitely not smooth or liquid like how a tube output source might be and is still well within what I think is a solid state sound, but it definitely has a great analog-like sound. the DP-85's soundstage is amazing. it is very broad and I didn't notice where it began or ended. the DAC1 I noticed a definite wall of sound near my ears where most of the sound seemed to be concentrated, but with the DP-85 it was very transparent in where the sound emerged from and was hard to locate where the headphone drivers were.

both are great sources and yet again I'm amazed at the quality of DAC's in the $1000 range, at least the DAC1 since I haven't heard that many DAC's in its range. the comparison was done using a CD, thus the high resolution capabilities of the DP-85 DAC and its further sonic improvements it gets when playing SACD's were not factored in. I assume the DAC1 would show similar improvements when fed high resolution DVD-Audio streams (I've heard of a few DVD-Adio players capable of outputting non-encrypted high resolution digital signals, but not for SACD players) so maybe the improvements I hear with the DP-85 would also be reflected in the DAC1 thus the comparison would remain pretty close and like Scrith mentioned, fairly dependent on personal tastes and the music they are playing, but you never know. another interesting fact is that supposedly the DP-85's internal transport to DAC connection is pretty high in jitter so using the same external transport connected to the DP-85's DAC and the DAC1 might be another interesting comparison to perform. possibly that can happen at a future meet.

that's it for now. I'm going to be lazy with it being summer... so the other impressions will roll out slowly as I recall stuff from the meet and write them down.
tongue.gif
 
Jun 26, 2005 at 3:50 AM Post #9 of 43
I’ve already written much regarding my elicit infatuation with the Sennheiser HE90 Orpheus headphone and its good friend the Kevin Gilmore Blue Hawaii electrostatic amplifier, but I will say again that even amongst titans like the R10 and Qualia 010, the HE90 remained the champion of Headphone-Dom. It’s elegant, yet vibrant presentation is unreal and the sweetness it is capable of is tear-inducing (almost). The HE90 does indeed transcend headphones – it simply makes music. I wish it sucked because I could gloat about its ridiculous, overrated stature. Now I can just cry that it’s still ridiculously priced, but it is indeed the pinnacle of audio reproduction. The Stax SR-007 is very fine as well, with a darker presentation that is tilted lower and illustrating some great midrange. However, next to the HE90 it is difficult to really enjoy the Omega II because it is slightly murky and veiled next to the HE90, almost like a slower HE90 wearing a thick towel and head removed. Almost. The SR-007 resides in the land of the L3000, K1000 and HP-1000, not quite at the HE90/R10 level.

The DHA3000 and ATH-L3000 are truly mad for each other, and they perform in concert like two long-lost lovers rediscovering their passions. Or something like that. The L3000 sounded veiled and distant even when being driven by the Dynamight and SDS-XLR, but it really came into its own when amplified by its sibling – perhaps the DHA3000’s DAC was actually applying some type of equalization to help the L3000’s performance. Still, even with its own amplifier the L3000 was in a tier lower than the R10/Qualia/HE90 in terms of performance. The L3000 dwells in the realm of the SR-007, PS-1, HP-1000 and HD650 IMO (but it still is my favorite AT and IMO their best work). The W2002 I didn’t even bother with, because it’s just a hot chick with no intelligence or class (I’ve spent enough time with her anyways).

The PS-1 (re-cabled by Alex’s braided wonder-cord – the stock cable really is of poor quality, worse than the HD650 cable IMO) driven balanced by Chris’ Dynamight was the most impact-full moment that evening – the PS-1 is already a pounding bass monster, but paired with the authoritative amp and it simply kicked my @ss. Still, despite this power and resolution I still found the sound flat and ultimately fatiguing; it’s a very enjoyable can for a couple hours but definitely not something I could live with as a sole headphone. The HP-2 (Joe Grado Ultra-wide Bandwidth cable) sounded best with the SDS-XLR, where its delicacy and objective perspective allowed it to portray a certain unique perspective that no other headphone could reproduce. Yet the HP-2 always sounds dull to me, as if it is lacking a soul. Quality sound: yes, but too dark and lifeless to live with.

The Sony MDR-R10 is IMO the finest dynamic headphone (still not quite as amazing as the HE90 but that’s a ‘stat anyway). It sounded good out of nearly every amp there: Dynamight (fast and dynamic, but a bit thin), DHA3000 ("midrangey" and snappy but diffused) SDS-XLR (powerful and detailed with great midrange). The MDR-R10 sounds at home with the SDS-XLR, as if the two have known each other for years and are re-uniting and re-establishing the chemistry. The bass is tight and detailed, the midrange is smooth and wet and the treble extends sans fatigue. The soundstage of the R10 is already special, but the SDS-XLR just widens the field and adds a touch of vertical placement that only the HE90 bests. However, Chris was correct about his assessment of the bass. Using the HE90 and Qualia, one notices a lacking sub-bass element with the R10 (regardless of amplification) – this void isn’t noticeable with most music, and even then I had to listen to the pieces myself with the Qualia/HE90 to realize this. Despite this flaw I still enjoy the R10 every time I listen to it – it’s a very comfortable ‘phone that sounds at home with nearly all equipment, and when given a superb amplification it will reward you with natural music that begins to transcend headphones.

Finally the Qualia 010 – Sony’s new phone has always held a strange place in my heart. It is probably the most fit-dependant headphone ever, perhaps even more so than an IEM!
wink.gif
It practically requires very capable amplification and an excellent source, and I find that without the Black Dragon it sounds thin and cavernous. What the Qualia does well is present every detail of the music in its own space. It demonstrates an excellent sub-bass that almost no other headphones achieve. It is the fastest headphone around and does have a slam that very invigorating. However, I still find that certain elements of its reproduction can be improved. This headphone is bright (my main headphone is the HD650, and the contrast between the two is startling – it’s even brighter than its little brother, the SA5000) and very unforgiving, in fact it’s probably the most unforgiving headphone ever, more than even the K1000. The cavern-effect, while mitigated by quality amplification and the Black Dragon cable (and by finagling the fit) can still be reduced further by lining the inner cup area with some diffusing fabric (a light velour would probably work, but we used tissues in a pinch). I preferred the Qualia from the Dynamight then from the SDS-XLR; the SDS lent the Qualia the best mids I’ve heard from them (almost R10-like) but the bass wasn’t as tight as the Dynamight and the treble seemed very slightly truncated. The Dynamight wasn’t quite as elegant and refined in the midrange, but its bass was tight and it SLAMMED, and the treble extended smoothly beyond the SDS’s ken. The differences in cables were startling. Even Alex’s custom braided cables (various composition from pure silver to copper-plated silver, etc.) still lacked the body and fullness granted by the Moon Audio Black Dragon cable – it seems Drew really did his homework with this one. If I owned the Qualia I wouldn’t hesitate in this regard (and balanced mode doesn’t hurt either).

I came away from this mini-meet with some pseudo-cogent ideas/questions about headphone audio:

1.Why is the HE90 so good?
2.The R10 really is a great headphone.
3.The Qualia sounds better with time and effort but still not my cup of sake.
4.The SDS-XLR is truly the best tube amp I’ve ever heard, and its synergy with the R10 is unholy and probably illegal in most states.
5.The L3000 is by far the best Audio-Technica headphone but still can’t match up with the big boys, even with its own amp – I guess AT will never be my house sound.
6.The SR-007 still lush and thick and no match for the HE90.
7.The Why didn’t Sony think up the Qualia-tissue-lined earcups themselves?
8.The Dynamight really held its own against the SDS-XLR. While I found the Singlepower amp superior with most headphones when midrange and soundstage were concerned, I preferred the tight bass ultra-clarity of sft’s Dynamight. The Qualia and the PS-1 are Dynamight fans, while the HD650, R10 and HP-2 are SDS-XLR fans.
9.Again my thoughts regarding balanced operation are re-affirmed – the PS-1, HD650 and Qualia all benefited from this.
10.The DAC1 and DP-85 aren’t as different as some (yours truly included) may have thought – while I find the DP-85’s SACD performance really bested the DAC1, its Redbook playback was simply different (thought more balanced on the whole) than “better.”
11.The Blockhead sounds good with the HD650 but not the Qualia nor the PS-1 and even with the HD650 it’s still sounded a bit gut-less. I have a feeling the new Balanced Max will be awe-inspiring.
12.The Gilmore Balanced Reference sounded less refined and powerful than its new sibling, the Dynamight. It’s strange how two similar amplifiers can be separated when heard side-by-side.

Thank you Alex and Chris for everything. I’m exhausted from the experience (and because I had a special assignment at work this morning – no rest for he wicked). Alex has lent Chris and me some gear to take to the San Jose meet:
Chris has Alex’s balanced PS-1 and MDR-R10 and I have Alex’s Blue Hawaii, HE90, SR-007, HP-2 and Qualia 010. See you August 6th, Chris!
smily_headphones1.gif


Some photos:
GEAR.jpg
PHONES.jpg
BEHIND.jpg
AT_DHA3K_L3K_W2002.jpg
POWER.jpg
POWER_CABLES.jpg
SDS_QUALIA.jpg
TUBES_MACRO.jpg
TUBES.jpg
SDS_REAR.jpg
SDS_PWR_DAC1.jpg
SDS.jpg
SDS_DYNA.jpg
DYNA_QUALIA.jpg
Qualias.jpg
XLR.jpg
DP-85_BH_HE90_SR007.jpg
DYNA_INT.jpg
BG.jpg
R10.jpg
QUALIA_LOVERS.jpg
CHRIS_R10.jpg


Alex’s $2000+ tube stash!
2K_TUBES.jpg


Some extra cans I now “own”
CANS.jpg
 
Jun 26, 2005 at 4:28 AM Post #10 of 43
Hey Guys,

Sound like you had a great time! One of these days when I'm in CA, we'll have to run off the DynaMight against my Balanced Reference, I think Alex's is pretty much stock and I found the Black Gates improved the refinment a lot with mine. I got to hear Hirsch's Supra-XPR last weekend and one thing was very clear. The same set of tubes isn't necessarilly a great match for all headphones. The set Hirsch had in worked great with the Qualia's and the RS-1s, but didn't mate as well with the PS-1s. While the RS-1s were a real eye opening experience to me, (mad lust from the opening note), the PS-1s didn't really hit their stride.
 
Jun 26, 2005 at 5:23 AM Post #11 of 43
some more things:

my Balanced Reference is really stock and I don't think there's anything in there that isn't already part of the basic model, other than the dual box configuration that is. but even with gpalmer's upgraded model, I doubt it has much of a chance against the Dynamight since I think the difference between my Balanced Reference and gpalmer's Balanced Reference was pretty small, but the difference between the Balanced Reference and Scrith's amp is fairly large. the refinement would be a definite improvement and would help the Balanced Reference, but the speed and dynamics of the Dynamight design wouldn't be matched by gpalmer's Balanced Reference IMO.

I sort of forgot about Hirsch's use of the 6SN7W tubes as output tubes (he mentioned this in the Maryland meet thread, though his combo was NU drivers with 6SN7W's as followers) yesterday and didn't even bother to check them out then... so I tried that today. too bad I didn't think of this yesterday since I should have done this at the meet.
tongue.gif
I think by replacing the 1952 6SN7GT Bad Boys with 6SN7W short bottles as output tubes, the sound is clearer and slightly more forward, with better dynamics, extension and slightly more authority. I don't have my Qualia 010 right now so am using the HD650's, so maybe these differences would make even more of a difference once I use this tube combo (six 6SN7W tubes) with the 010. with this change, and reading what Scrith and NeilPeart wrote already (which I agree with for the most part, same observations but some factors weighed differently), I think what the SDS-XLR slightly lacked when compared to the Dynamight is corrected for, although how much I cannot say.

so where's that Dynamight for the revised comparison?
smily_headphones1.gif
but from what I remember, I think the Dynamight will still have better dynamics and slam, but the other differences should be even more minimal, probably the same now? the bass on the Dynamight is I guess tighter, but the solen caps in the SDS-XLR are huge and probably takes some more time to tighten up and sound their best. the SDS-XLR still has the great tube sound, and with this the Dynamight can never match it I would think.

time to go find some other tube choices... probably need to get some more tubes too.

should be interesting to see how things change after further use and tweaking. Scrith's Dynamight and my SDS-XLR are still relatively new with it being only about a month or so after we received them.
 
Jun 26, 2005 at 6:55 AM Post #12 of 43
Doh, I knew I forgot something. Yes, the DP-85 was awesome with the SACD we tried...the best source sound of the evening, by far! The comparisons I did between the DP-85 and DAC1 were referring to the redbook audio only, of course.
 
Jun 26, 2005 at 8:44 PM Post #13 of 43
Some teaser shots of “my” HE90:

Sennhesier_1.jpg
Sennhesier_2.jpg
Sennhesier_3.jpg
Sennhesier_4.jpg


I know I promised to listen only to the Qualia for at least 2 weeks, Chris, but I’ll start next week, I assure you! The Qualia just sounds cavernous and glaringly bright so I need to gradually move from the HD650 to the Qualia, and I’m using the HP-2 and HE90 as stepping stones…
orphsmile.gif
 
Jun 26, 2005 at 9:48 PM Post #14 of 43
About the L3000/DHA-3000 pairing: Did the sound get better or worse when the DHA-3000 was just used as an amp (or just used as a dac, for that matter)?

Man, I wish Sennheiser would start making the Orpheus again, it's the only other headphone I really want to hear.
 
Jun 26, 2005 at 9:53 PM Post #15 of 43
Whoa, that Dynamight looks incredible!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top