sandys
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2007
- Posts
- 77
- Likes
- 0
So, after getting my first pair of really nice earphones (superfi5 eb), I want to learn how to rip tracks in all its glory.
1. I know that the best is LAME - I m gonna use it anyway since I basically only use Linux, however for my GF I need a really simple Win-GUI software that (hopefully uses LAME and all the nice settings that are needed).
2. Assuming I use LAME, could you guys post your command line options so that I can use them : I went through an earlier thread that was posted here and this is the most relevant parts of the conversation
Quote:
3. What is the deal with "-V0"? I have come across a few threads that basically say that it is better and smaller than AAC. If so, is the mp3 that is produced, compatible with *most* mp3 players?
thanks
1. I know that the best is LAME - I m gonna use it anyway since I basically only use Linux, however for my GF I need a really simple Win-GUI software that (hopefully uses LAME and all the nice settings that are needed).
2. Assuming I use LAME, could you guys post your command line options so that I can use them : I went through an earlier thread that was posted here and this is the most relevant parts of the conversation
Quote:
320 kbps: -b 320 -m j -q 0 --replaygain-accurate (you can change the bitrate) VBR Best ONLY: -b 32 -m j -V 0 -B 320 -q 0 --vbr-new --lowpass 19.7 --replaygain-accurate (you cannot change the "-V" option for to receive smaller bitrate) VBR Best: -b 32 -m j -V 0 -B 320 -q 0 --vbr-new --replaygain-accurate (you can change the "-V" option for receive smaller bitrate) "--vbr-old" forces encoder to use only the specified quality. While at "--vbr-new" the codec does not pay attention on "-V0" an option, and always uses "-V2" or above, depending on specified. This can be checked up for example by means of HEX-editor WinHEX by comparison feature. Despite these possible issues, --vbr-new is currently recommended over the default VBR mode due to both the speed and quality increases afforded by the new algorithm. |
3. What is the deal with "-V0"? I have come across a few threads that basically say that it is better and smaller than AAC. If so, is the mp3 that is produced, compatible with *most* mp3 players?
thanks