1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

    Dismiss Notice

REVIEW: Vivo Xplay 3S + XE800 Mobile audio perfection

First
 
Back
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
41 42 43 44 45
Next
 
Last
  1. SkiesOfAzel

    I am reffering to the vent found further away from the nozzle (hense the "back" term). Technically it is indeed on the front, next to the L/R letter.
     
  2. chickenmoon

    Ok, I have figured out what the the problem is. There is a valley at 2.5/3khz and I need to boost them there by at least 5db for them to sound about right. If I don't, they sound veiled/muddy with most of the music I listen to.

    Looking at GR07 measurements I can see they all have that valley and therefore presumably have the same issue which is a show stopper for me no matter how crisp they otherwise are.

    Is this something that improves with lots of burn in? After about 50 hours there is no improvement on that front with my pair.
     
  3. hoshiyomi
    [Beware this mod changes sound significantly]
    I have taken a leap of faith and punctured the far front vent as you described, and it resulted in a significant amount of bass being released, perhaps a bit much even! It also affected the pair to which I sabotaged the back, which implies the back to the shell is not acoustically connected to the "back" of the driver.
     
    I may have come across what feels like some glue on the other side of the far front vent, so maybe it is a wide spread QC issue. These actually sound quite warm now.
     
  4. SkiesOfAzel
     
    Yeah, it's very probable that the variance isn't created by some kind of new tuning, but by lax quality control. Still, the XE800 i own has outlasted 2 pairs of GR07 despite the poor qc and the flimsy cable. This tells you more about the GR07 than it does for the Vivo though...
     
     
     
    What you describe is not exactly a valley, it's produced by a spike at around 6.5k that is a lot less pronounced on the XE800 than it is on the GR07s. The reason the XE800 can sound a little grainy is that despite what most think, it has a slight midbass to low mids hump (80-300hz). This is the region where most bad mixes show themselves (the "muddy" region) so what you get with the XE800 is more pronounced imperfections that were already there. Now, it's perfectly fine if you don't like the XE800s tuning, but in the technical department, the biocellulose drivers it uses are more capable than most of the competition at or bellow the 100$ mark.
     
  5. chickenmoon

    Obviously what's on either side of a valley could be called a peak and vice-versa but looking at graphs there is clearly a 2.5/3khz valley in what otherwise would be a smooth curve so I can't really agree with you here.

    And the veil/muddiness comes from those recessed frequencies, nothing to do with the bass region (or a poor recording for that matter).

    Those biocellulose drivers are certainly very capable when it comes to speed & low distortion but to me it seems that unfortunately they intrinsically suffer from poor tonal balance in the highs which no tuning can correct.
     
  6. SkiesOfAzel
     
     
    [EDIT]
    If you find raw (uncompensated) fr graphs of the GR07 you will see that there is actually a slight peak around 2.5k. In fact, GR07's raw graph is a good indication that Vsonic has just opted for a different reference target than Etymotic and others which is not necessarily a bad choice. The problematic regions that the various reference targets try to compensate for are the lower region and the high mids (2-3k).
     
    What causes headaches though is the fact that not every person has the same hearing deficiencies, so for some people, including myself, the Etymotic compensation sounds like a boost in that region. As for the lower region, Etymotic conveniently ignored it (their single ba architecture is inherently weak at reproducing bass), while others go above and beyond the 4db compensation target. The GR07 raw graph indicates that Vsonic did try to compensate for both regions, but their compensations were more conservative, probably in order to make it sound close to neutral to as many people as possible. It's a reasonable trade if you ask me.
     
    They did mess the treble up though, i won't deny that. But the GR07X has supposedly fixed that as well, so it's not impossible to tune the driver. Still, i will not buy another GR07 till it has fully replaceable cables.
     
  7. chickenmoon

    Ok, I've had a better look at GR07 Innerfidelity graphs which show raw and compensated curves and I was, I believe, both right and wrong. Wrong in identifying the "problem" frequency to be at 2.5/3khz when it would appear it's at around 4khz actually. Both graphs show a valley at that frequency. If I boost at 4khz with a narrower EQ setting than before, the slight veil I feel on some tracks is lifted. Impossible to say what the EQ boost precisely does and how much of the surrounding frequencies it also drags up without measurement equipment.

    All this is quite subtle however and might well be a matter of taste and tuning after all. :rolleyes:
     
  8. hakuzen
    my last take on VSonic GR07 classic ed. vs Vivo XE800, raw measurements using a (supposedly) IEC711 coupler:
     
    GR07-XE800_raw.png
     
    XE800 2.5/3KHz peak is louder than GR07's (but still below 0dB when compensated), and also the 6/6.5KHz and 8/9KHz peaks.
    that's why it seems a tad brighter than GR07.
     
    Above 15KHz highs, XE800 has more roll-off, but few people will be capable of hearing those frequencies.
     
    SkiesOfAzel likes this.
  9. SkiesOfAzel
     
    You got a great GR07 mate. Out of the 3 i've owned, only the last one had treble that was near as smooth as your pair's. The other two (an MK2 and a CE) both had higher 6 and 8k peaks than my XE800. In my experience there is plenty of unit variance with the GR07 and the treble above 5k. It should be even worse with the XE800 which is significantly cheaper and thus subject to less quality control.
     
  10. hakuzen

    glad to know it; that explains why i don't find my GR07 CE as harsh and sibilant as others' reports.
     
    about the XE800, i had the chance to measure 9 pairs from three different sellers, and found a very good consistency between them. the only differences consisted in some bass imbalance (left vs right) in a few units (i suspect it's due to the "back" vent drilling you mentioned, so it should be fixable).
    here are raw measures from them, together with GR07 CE, but using a DIY coupler (not IEC711):
     
    GR07vsXE800.png
     
    SkiesOfAzel likes this.
  11. pfloyd
    I notice my an16 has dimples where ports normally are on the gr06. Has anyone punched those out and measure the change? I like them but could use a bass boost.
     
  12. SkiesOfAzel
     
    You've done a fantastic job with these graphs mate, thanks! My XE800 sounds like a combination of the 2 year old's bass with the one year old's treble. Treble peaks aside, it's closer to reference but it sounds V shaped to my ears whereas the GR07 always sounded flat to me till around 4-5k. Still, what matters most is that they all share the same driver. You can easily eq the fr with a tone generator to make it sound flat to your ears, but speed, transient response, distortion and the like can't be improved and there is where the XE800/GR07 drivers excel.
     
     
     
    I would only experiment with the back vent. It's further away from the driver so it's safer and it's the one that affects the bass:
     
    gr06.jpg
     
    If you don't like the result you can easily re-seal it so it should be a low risk test.
     
  13. pfloyd
    Yeah that's the one I meant and as you said easy to reverse, but my big concern is damage to driver as housing is much smaller than the gr07, would like more info on clearance if available.
    By the way I'm listening to Soft Machine on the vsd2s that came with the an16 and it sounds excellent, under appreciated gem.
     
  14. hakuzen
    thanks, bro. i agree.
    xe800 2.5/3KHz upper-mids are closer to reference, louder than gr07's. both xe800 and gr07 6KHz peak is louder than 2.5/3KHz peak (when measured with iec711 coupler); this gives them that bright tonality, which helps to get the sensation of better resolution and detail. 9KHz peak is also loud.
    xe800 mid-bass is also louder than gr07's.
    so louder mid-bass + louder upper-mids confers more v-shape than in gr07. anyway, compared with most phones, both are still quite balanced and flat.
    like you say, this can be eq'ed, but the speed, transient response, distortion, etc. (not improvable) of these drivers are really good. that's why i got so many xe800 for so cheap, they've been my christmas gifts for my relatives/friends.
     
  15. pfloyd
    Well I did it, used small drill bit and slowly peeled out soft plastic at dimple site, be careful cable threads through there, but man glad I did, really warmed up and opened soundstage, less compressed/ more dynamic. I like :thumbsup: This was to the an16.
     
First
 
Back
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
41 42 43 44 45
Next
 
Last

Share This Page