wiinippongamer
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2011
- Posts
- 99
- Likes
- 13
Well that's a pretty benign area to have it I think.
Well that's a pretty benign area to have it I think.
It think will actually help stop things from having that analytical, smaller than life feeling IEMs do. I don't think there is a perfect in IEMs but some are clearly better than others and as long as frequency aberrations are benign, there's a bigger picture to worry about. Is the top smooth or does it have a bit of sparkle?
TWFK.
At around 3600 cycles.
Good review, LFF. You seriously have me curious about this IEM.
David is a class act as well -- wishing him all the best in Frogbeats.
(BTW, how many people immediately put on Come Together to listen for the pedal click?)
These things do sound great...now if I could just remember where I hid that huge pile of money so I can get a pair :/
Sounds like it to me. The TWFK is one of the few drivers with a dip at ~3.6-3.7 kHz. That gap is unavoidable, no matter how much tweaking you put into it; Knowles has put a lot of effort into decreasing that gap, and yet it's still present. Then again, I can't be sure, as I haven't heard/seen the C4, obviously. It seems as though these days, Sonion has been making TWFK-esque drivers; I thought for sure that earlier pictures of the C5 showed it used two TWFK units and a CI, but clearly, the C5 product description says it uses Sonion. It's also possible that they're using a ED + WBFK, which would potentially also cause a similar 3.6 kHz suckout. Not that any of this matters, however. As long as it sounds good, it doesn't matter whose company's drivers are used.