REVIEW: SONY SCD-1 CD PLAYER

Jan 26, 2003 at 8:13 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 15

CRESCENDOPOWER

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Sep 15, 2004
Posts
2,581
Likes
10
[size=small]REVIEW: SONY SCD-1 CD PLAYER [/size]



Associated Equipment

Digital source : Sony SCD-C555ES
Interconnects : Cardas Golden Cross
Headphones : Sennheiser HD-600s, and Beyerdynamic DT-770 pros
Headphone cable : Stephan AudioArt Equinox


Music used

Shakira – Laundry Service
Tool – Anemia
John Tesh – Avalon
ZZ Top – Eliminator
Jennifer Warnes – The Hunter


Introduction

It's really too bad that the only other CD player I have to make a direct comparison to the Sony SCD-1 is the Sony SCD-C555ES which retails less than 6 times the cost of the SCD-1. So, in no way will this comparison be fair, but it might give an idea into what 6 times the money can give with a source component upgrade.


Appearance

I’m sure that a large percentage of the cost to build this unit was spent on the exterior. A lot of the time when a manufacturer bothers to build a product that is brawny on the outside usually is an indication, or mirroring of what’s on the inside. Weighing in at almost 60-pounds with 5 feet underneath tells me that Sony was not playing any games.
This is a very clean, simple, and industrial looking CD player. Throughout the entire enclosure you can clearly see all the screws, and the front of the player consists of only the display, and power button. I find the display to be large, and very easy to read. The back of the player is quite simple also. There are two pair of line level analog outputs one balanced, and the other unbalanced with a switch to turn on, or off the balanced outputs. The command mode selector on the back gives the ability to control the SCD-1, and another Sony CD player with the same remote. In addition, there is one coaxial digital output, and one optical digital output. I might add that all connectors on the SCD-1 are very well constructed, and for stock the power cable looks pretty good too. As for the remote control, I have seen much sturdier ones on units of this price range.


Sound

A lot of people let their components burn in for a while before they listen. I prefer to hear the changes as I go along. Right out of the box it sounded a little bright, but was still leagues ahead of the SCD-C555ES, and very well should be for the asking price. Early on I noticed a lot of spitting in the upper midrange, but with time it seemed to go away. One thing is for sure though, if you put in a bad recording that is exactly what you’re going to get back. I find it amazing how bad actually most of my recordings really are. Maybe I need to change the music I listen to. Another thing that I noticed right away was that my extremely tubey sounding amp didn’t quite sound so tubey anymore. The midrange magic was still there, but with a lot more extension in the frequency extremes. There was a lot more tick, tick, tick going on in the treble, and bass simply sounded like a tight, and tuneful subwoofer was added. The pace of the music just flew faster with a huge improvement in transient speed. Also, the SCD-1 was a huge step up over the SCD-555ES in background blackness, refinement, and transparency. The sound staging was also larger, and more airy. I think a lot of that can be contributed to the increased treble extension. But, I feel the most noticeable improvement was in the bass slam. I remember my Denon DCD-1650AR being extremely strong in this area, but not this dynamic.


Picky me

There were a few things I dislike about the SCD-1. Every disc I put in takes me forever to get it going. Got to wait for the door to open take out the stabilizer take out the disc put the new disc in replace the stabilizer then close the damn door. Then, it takes a little while before the disc actually gets going. Believe me; don’t ever buy a 5-disc changer it will make you lazy.
Not only is the remote cheap for a $5000.00 unit; I can’t believe that there are no buttons on the remote to turn the unit on, and off, or to open the door to replace a disc. I hate having to put my grubby hands on the unit itself to do all this.
The SCD-1 has caused me to completely rearrange my room. Can’t put a 60-pound CD player on my computer desk, so in comes the big audio rack. Then, I find myself listening at a much lower volume level, because of the low level detail, so now I need to put my noisy computer case with all its fans out in the hall. Unbelievable!
Also, with the SCD-C555ES I could pretty much set the volume, and leave it alone from disc to disc, but not with the SCD-1. Many of the older discs from the early 80’s required me to bump the sound up quite a bit more in the SCD-1.


Conclusion

Well, the big question for me is did the SCD-1 make 6 times the improvement to my musical enjoyment in comparison to the SCD-C555ES? Probably not 6 times, but I certainly feel it is well worth its asking price. It certainly made a huge improvement to my headphone system that’s for sure. It improved the exact areas that my system needed. Now it’s time to just sit back, and enjoy the music!
 
Jan 26, 2003 at 8:22 AM Post #2 of 15
WOW, congrats on obtaining one hell of a source!
biggrin.gif
I got to audition one with my R10s once, that thing had a background blackness to die for. Decays went on and on and on. Details just pop out at you. You think you might consider modding it in the future?
 
Jan 26, 2003 at 4:19 PM Post #5 of 15
Quote:

I find it amazing how bad actually most of my recordings really are. Maybe I need to change the music I listen to.


Crescendopower,

You must be kidding. Honestly, how about changing your source?
 
Jan 26, 2003 at 5:40 PM Post #7 of 15
Well, that brings up a very important point.

It's the whole Musicality vs Neutrality debate. Which is better?

1) A source that is so neutral and revealing that it makes your badly recorded CDs sound worst and your best recorded CDs sound better.

OR

2) A source that is so musical that it makes your badly recorded CDs sound like audiophile CDs and your audiophile CDs sound like SACDs?


For some people they rather have the #1 for they believe that this is truer to the source material, and for the rest it would be #2 since they think that the whole point of this whole audiophile bit is to get the maximum enjoyment out of the music you love.
 
Jan 26, 2003 at 5:51 PM Post #8 of 15
Quote:

It's the whole Musicality vs Neutrality debate. Which is better?


I agree with those that say truly high-end components make your great CDs sound phenomenal and still bring out the best in even badly-recorded stuff.
 
Jan 26, 2003 at 10:53 PM Post #9 of 15
Quote:

Originally posted by Tomcat
Crescendopower,

You must be kidding. Honestly, how about changing your source?


Well, I did a lot of reading, and auditioned 2 of the players that were supposed to be better than the SCD-1 in Redbook performance. I left those auditions highly disappointed. I thought that because they had tube analog outputs they would be more forgiving. Man, was I wrong.
I think the SCD-1 has a pretty good balance between forgiveness, and detail in my system over the other players, and I can still easily here all the flaws in bad recordings. I think going for a more romantic CD player with my interconnects, amp, and headphones would probably be too much of a good thing.

Quote:

Originally posted by Vertigo-1


You think you might consider modding it in the future?


Probably not, I'll keep it for a while, and if things change I'll probably go for a high-end outboard DAC, unless someone comes out with a killer one-box unit in the next 3 years.
 
Jan 27, 2003 at 4:35 AM Post #10 of 15
Yep, that player is excellent. I was able to hear one with a McIntosh system at a local dealer, and it was nothing short of amazing.
 
Jan 27, 2003 at 5:02 AM Post #11 of 15
CRESCENDOPOWER,


My heartiest congratulations. You just bought the one piece of audio equipment in the world that I most covet. I had the chance to audition one, at length, some time ago, and found it absolutely superb, the best cd player, and by far the best sacd player I have ever heard.
Even aside from that, it is a brilliant design, with that incredible tecno-industrial massiveness and solidity. As though it had literally been a single block of steel that was machined down to this size, intact. I love the way it looks as much as I appreciate its incredible sound.
I cannot tell you how much I regret that I cant afford one myself. You have a wonderful unit there, enjoy every moment with it. And make sure to audition some of the best sacds on it, it will leave you speechless.
If they ever came out with a multi-channel sacd version of the SCD-1, I might literally turn to crime to get one. <g>.


JC
 
Jan 27, 2003 at 5:26 AM Post #13 of 15
Cresendo, are you coming to Seattle any time soon? See, we've got this meet thing we're planning, and if you don't bring that gleaming hunk of eargasm inducing steel and silicon over to Seattle RIGHT NOW, I'm going to get Jude to give me your IP and hunt you down...
wink.gif
evil_smiley.gif


In any case, can I have it when you upgrade?
http://www.stereophile.com/showarchives.cgi?340

Arguably the best, and certainly the most expensive SACD player ever made - the Accuphase DP-100/101 transport/DAC combination. It can be yours for only $30k. Best of all, the DAC is compatible with DVD-A for when Accuphase comes out with a DVD-A transport, and the DAC will also work with your existing CD transports...
wink.gif
 
Jan 27, 2003 at 5:49 AM Post #14 of 15
Quote:

Originally posted by eric343
Cresendo, are you coming to Seattle any time soon? See, we've got this meet thing we're planning, and if you don't bring that gleaming hunk of eargasm inducing steel and silicon over to Seattle RIGHT NOW, I'm going to get Jude to give me your IP and hunt you down...
wink.gif
evil_smiley.gif


In any case, can I have it when you upgrade?
http://www.stereophile.com/showarchives.cgi?340

Arguably the best, and certainly the most expensive SACD player ever made - the Accuphase DP-100/101 transport/DAC combination. It can be yours for only $30k. Best of all, the DAC is compatible with DVD-A for when Accuphase comes out with a DVD-A transport, and the DAC will also work with your existing CD transports...
wink.gif


Good thing they don't give out home loans for audio equipment, or I just might....
No, really I was looking into the Arcam FMJ CD23T which probably represents a lot less diminishing returns for your money, but every dealer in my area wanted list price.

Quote:

Originally posted by kentamcolin
How about some photos?


Audio equipment comes first with this poor boy. No digital camera.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top