Review: NuForce DAC-80 - replacement for the DAC-100 (same sound, lower price)
post-9772649
Post #16 of 89

project86

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
7,087
Reaction score
2,089
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Posts
7,087
Likes
2,089
  Anyone have any idea how DAC-80/100 would sound compared to Asus Xonar one Muses edition? Im not sure which one to buy. I am a NuForce IA-7 owner and a Xonar STX owner, so i am a fan of both brands. Tough choice.
 
Reviewer at 6moons said that the Xonar One Muses wins the DAC-100 though.
 
 
For what it's worth, I like the DAC-80 more than the Essence STU with the Muses opamps. I found the STU with Muses to be roughly on par with the Essence One. 
 
     Share This Post       
post-9773242
Post #17 of 89

Zebra

New Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Messages
30
Reaction score
10
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Posts
30
Likes
10
Project86, do you have a preference between the Concero and the DAC-80?
 
     Share This Post       
post-9773317
Post #18 of 89

project86

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
7,087
Reaction score
2,089
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Posts
7,087
Likes
2,089
  Project86, do you have a preference between the Concero and the DAC-80?
 
Depends. Are we talking original Concero or Concero HD? DAC-80 has a more dynamic sound, very exciting. Concero is somewhat more relaxed, and Concero HD more detailed. Different sounds (and features) for different needs. 
 
     Share This Post       
post-9773531
Post #19 of 89

Zebra

New Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Messages
30
Reaction score
10
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Posts
30
Likes
10
I am interested in your thoughts on the 24-bit Concero and the DAC-80 used as a USB DAC.
 
     Share This Post       
post-9774653
Post #20 of 89

Armaegis

Modern Modder Man of Manitoba
HTML... uphill, both ways!
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
12,160
Reaction score
1,119
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Posts
12,160
Likes
1,119
   
 
For what it's worth, I like the DAC-80 more than the Essence STU with the Muses opamps. I found the STU with Muses to be roughly on par with the Essence One. 
 
Now you just need to slap the Muses into the DAC-100/80

 
     Share This Post       
post-9774846
Post #21 of 89

dlyz

New Head-Fier
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Messages
16
Reaction score
10
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Posts
16
Likes
10
   
Now you just need to slap the Muses into the DAC-100/80
 
   
 
For what it's worth, I like the DAC-80 more than the Essence STU with the Muses opamps. I found the STU with Muses to be roughly on par with the Essence One. 
 
Thanks for the feedback guys. Its still tough decision to make due to the price of the DACs and my country's weak currency. I did ask around but so far and not many ppl have tested both DACs.
 
So i changed my approach and asked, how far improvement will i get if i buy either DAC vs my STX. Some say very much improvement due to the better power supply and away from the EMI/RFI interference. Some say, by a small margin but improvement is there.
 
What is your opinion on this? The answer will most likely make me pull the trigger to get the DAC-100, i wont be getting the newer DAC-80 because the new distributer in the country decided to mark up all NuForce products and DAC-80 is more expensive than the DAC-100. 
 
     Share This Post       
post-9775387
Post #22 of 89

project86

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
7,087
Reaction score
2,089
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Posts
7,087
Likes
2,089
  I am interested in your thoughts on the 24-bit Concero and the DAC-80 used as a USB DAC.
 
The original Concero is really great. So is the DAC-80, but if all you want is pure USB DAC functionality, no preamp and no SPDIF inputs, the Concero might be the better buy. It's more neutral overall versus the NuForce having that mild coloration tipped towards making everything sound good.
 
   
Now you just need to slap the Muses into the DAC-100/80
 
Not sure if I dare. Got the Muses01 and 02 here, and seem to like the 02 best. Maybe I'll try when I get a moment. The stock LM4562 is no slouch though.
 
     Share This Post       
post-9806121
Post #25 of 89

curiousmuffin

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
May 25, 2008
Messages
178
Reaction score
11
Joined
May 25, 2008
Posts
178
Likes
11
my bad, only looked at the picture hah.
 
interesting the chip that garners so much attention for this popular dac is also one of the least popular for diy crowd for reasons unknown to me. 
 
thanks for the info :)
 
     Share This Post       
post-9806239
Post #26 of 89

Armaegis

Modern Modder Man of Manitoba
HTML... uphill, both ways!
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
12,160
Reaction score
1,119
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Posts
12,160
Likes
1,119
Probably because it takes more work than most DIY can handle?
 
     Share This Post       
post-9806363
Post #27 of 89

curiousmuffin

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
May 25, 2008
Messages
178
Reaction score
11
Joined
May 25, 2008
Posts
178
Likes
11
i doubt that's the main reason.
 
there are chips that are harder to 'handle' than 4390 that are more popular.
 
     Share This Post       
post-9806427
Post #28 of 89

Armaegis

Modern Modder Man of Manitoba
HTML... uphill, both ways!
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
12,160
Reaction score
1,119
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Posts
12,160
Likes
1,119
Who knows. Maybe they had a general architecture in mind and this one fit the best.
 
Or maybe they picked it precisely because it wasn't popular for DIY

 
     Share This Post       
post-9818873
Post #29 of 89

project86

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
7,087
Reaction score
2,089
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Posts
7,087
Likes
2,089
I just figure it's not a well known DAC chip, so it isn't used often. AKM in general gets less use compared to Cirrus, TI, Wolfson, and ESS. AKM is roughly in the same place as Analog Devices - both make good DAC chips which for some reason are less commonly used than others. 
 
     Share This Post       
post-9820074
Post #30 of 89

Clemmaster

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Dec 20, 2009
Messages
2,778
Reaction score
420
Joined
Dec 20, 2009
Posts
2,778
Likes
420
  I just figure it's not a well known DAC chip, so it isn't used often. AKM in general gets less use compared to Cirrus, TI, Wolfson, and ESS. AKM is roughly in the same place as Analog Devices - both make good DAC chips which for some reason are less commonly used than others. 
 
I love the Fostex HP-A3 which features the AKM4390.
I find it sound very clean and transparent but also very smooth and maybe sweet even.
It's very good at revealing ambience in the scene. Not the last word in terms of details, but the Fostex USB is quite outdated now (Tenor 7022L, which is fine but there's better nowadays).
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top