Hi Roy,
Great report, as usual. It's funny that both you and I, having assembled our sCLK-EX based chains, are now curious to see if there are one-box solutions that can match up, or at least come close. You've gone the server route, while I have stayed with the endpoint based trifecta based approach.
Since my approach is still endpoint based, the 2 devices about which I am very curious are the dCS Network Bridge, and the Bricasti M5. While I have had no luck getting my hands on a loaner M5, I was able to audition a dCS NB from my local dealer.
As you know from my post on the CA thread, I had a chance to compare the dCS NB to my trifecta medley. Like you, I found a lot to like in the NB, but due to limited time, and an unfamiliar system, I reserved judgement until I could try out the NB in my system, and
@Limniscate 's system. I will be doing that once the USB output firmware is out.
Obviously, the key question for many is - can the one-box NB achieve the SQ of the fiddly "spaghetti" trifecta chain? We shall see!
One area of uncertainty in my mind with the NB (and the M5 too) is regarding the Ethernet and the USB clocks. With the SOtM clock chain, the big revelation, and indeed the raison d'être for the chain, is that clock quality for system things (USB, Ethernet, and mobo) matters just as profoundly as the clocks for the data (the area dCS has been renowned for decades). I have tried to ascertain exactly what clocks dCS uses for their system things, but have not got a good answer. I am hopeful that the clock used here is of a quality approaching, or indeed surpassing the SOtM sCLK-EX, but we don't know.
Your experiment with the Mutec MC-3+ USB will be interesting, but there again, you will only be able to get the Ref 10 "goodness" in through the word clock input of the NB, and it is unclear whether that will lift the quality of the system clocks.
I'll be reporting my results in Nov, because I will only borrow the NB from my dealer after the USB firmware update is in place.