Arkyle
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts
- 174
- Likes
- 15
Haha I think I didn't make myself clear. I'm asking if they let in a lot of noise (more than ie the sennheiser HD5XX or 6XX series) because I might have a use for super leaky headphones.
Inquiry, are all headphones pretty much the same in regard to directional sound? Meaning, there are no headphones designed specifically for surround sound because they're all stereo. Am I missing something?
I'm just curious on the performance of the AD900X in regards to games.
I'm not a psychoacoustic scientist, but I am sure this is almost certainly untrue, especially because you have two ears - your brain 'works in stereo' too. Your brain decodes spatial cues from the differences between two sources of sound, so there is technically no reason why stereo headphones could not deliver perfect 3D sound.
Binaural recordings specifically take advantage of this idea; listen to this on headphones: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUDTlvagjJA
Different headphones will deliver directional sound differently because of the way the frequencies reach your ears, and also because of the headphone's ability to deliver clear transients that your brain can decode for information.
If a headphone has phase issues, for instance, different frequencies will reach your ears at different times, and soundstaging will get weird as a result. (Something like the XBA-4 seems to have severe phase issues).
Angled drivers are designed to mimic the way that sound waves reach your ears and interact with the shape of your outer ears, another way that you infer location. (Though we are not as good as bats). Sennheiser developed the ring shaped driver in the HD800 on the basis that it produced a circular wavefront that was closer to how humans hear sound, etc.
So no, I don't think headphones are the same regards to directional sound, though the differences are hard to articulate because of the variety of factors. We have a description for it - soundstage - but I often feel that a lot of confusion comes up on Head-Fi when we talk about soundstage because some headphones sound very wide because they have a high frequency emphasis that makes echo and reverb prominent, without actually being able to position instruments within that space (AD900X) or headphones that can place instruments very well, but have a treble shelf that makes them sound closed in or more intimate (Sennheiser Momentum / LCD-2 ).
Seems like there is some concern about frame construction on the MA900. Could the cans be candidates for a transplant into another frame or are they some weird size? Same thing with the pads: are they "standard" or are they some unusual size?
I'm afraid I can't really make a direct comparison because I haven't heard the Q701 / K701 for very long, and I haven't heard the MA900 and Q701 side by side... someone else might have an opinion though!
The MA900’s treble section is probably the least interesting part of the sound. It’s there, you can hear it, but there’s no particular character to it. Compared to the AD900X it sounds positively blunted.