Sovkiller
Proved that despite its huge size the CD3000 can be shoved down one's throat.
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2002
- Posts
- 12,902
- Likes
- 29
I was not talking of tube amps, just solid state, not sure Ari where did you get that insane idea that the 70-80 are the worst era for SS amps. I grow up on that era and I can tell you that you are absolutely wrong on that, still have a Pioneer under the bed, working fine, and sounds fabulous. Just go to audio circles and you will get recos all the time about Sansui's, Marantz, Pioneer, Kenwood from the early seventies, as the best choices, again tubes aside, which you know I do not like too much....Maybe I extended the time frame too much, let's reduce it to 70's and early 80's, only, it is true that in the late 80's there was a lot of crap produced...
It is funny how people mention in inefficiency of class-A SS as down point, while tubes are far less efficient, and they are still used, and consume a huge amount of energy in comparison to any Class-A SS amp...
You do not need black gates, of course, you can use any cap and being a decent brand, with the appropriate ratings, and you will not hear any difference, but that is what people like to use all the time, and reco all the time, since I joined Head fi the first day, they like to pay premium prices for nothing, same as those so mentioned as an upgrade, Jensen paper in oil caps from the 50's, etc...
The problem with the wires is that on those vintage amps they manufacturers tend to use solid core wires, the rosin core of the solder used at that time was corrosive enough and sometimes it corrode the cooper, and sometimes you get broken contacts and broken wires internaly, even while they look fine externally, the case that crossed my mind was once with a CTF4140 Pioneer deck long time ago, I was crazy trying to hunt an oscialltion after replacing the permalloy heads and adjusting the bias for some glass ferrite heads, and all was due to the freking broken wire in one board...
As per class A, well just get efficient speakers, no need to use inefficient ones, what for? But even using the worst speakers, in your home, would you be able to use more than 10-15 Watts per channel? Unless you live in a jungle, your neighbors will put you out of town soon...
As a reference I have never used my Marantz in any region close to half a volume yet in Class-A...
BTW the Maratnz is 25 watts per channel in class A, but if you want to run it class AB, you will get 95 watts per channel, IMO not bad at all for a 250 watts AC power consumption rated amp...otherwise then where did you leave those absurd 8 watts tube mono-blocks that can keep the room warm on the wintertime...Is there any logic behind those???
It is funny how people mention in inefficiency of class-A SS as down point, while tubes are far less efficient, and they are still used, and consume a huge amount of energy in comparison to any Class-A SS amp...
You do not need black gates, of course, you can use any cap and being a decent brand, with the appropriate ratings, and you will not hear any difference, but that is what people like to use all the time, and reco all the time, since I joined Head fi the first day, they like to pay premium prices for nothing, same as those so mentioned as an upgrade, Jensen paper in oil caps from the 50's, etc...
The problem with the wires is that on those vintage amps they manufacturers tend to use solid core wires, the rosin core of the solder used at that time was corrosive enough and sometimes it corrode the cooper, and sometimes you get broken contacts and broken wires internaly, even while they look fine externally, the case that crossed my mind was once with a CTF4140 Pioneer deck long time ago, I was crazy trying to hunt an oscialltion after replacing the permalloy heads and adjusting the bias for some glass ferrite heads, and all was due to the freking broken wire in one board...
As per class A, well just get efficient speakers, no need to use inefficient ones, what for? But even using the worst speakers, in your home, would you be able to use more than 10-15 Watts per channel? Unless you live in a jungle, your neighbors will put you out of town soon...
As a reference I have never used my Marantz in any region close to half a volume yet in Class-A...
BTW the Maratnz is 25 watts per channel in class A, but if you want to run it class AB, you will get 95 watts per channel, IMO not bad at all for a 250 watts AC power consumption rated amp...otherwise then where did you leave those absurd 8 watts tube mono-blocks that can keep the room warm on the wintertime...Is there any logic behind those???