daltonlanny
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2007
- Posts
- 1,629
- Likes
- 211
I have some good news and some bad news:
First, the good news: I received my Rega Saturn yesterday and its been burning in ever since.
The bad news: I am not that impressed with it as of yet.
At this point, I like the sound of my Marantz SA8001 better, believe it or not, especially using my new Signal Cable Silver Resolution Reference Interconnects from the Marantz SA8001 to my HeadAmp GS-1 headphone amp!
The Saturn is warmer, smoother, and more laid-back than the Marantz, and has slightly tighter and better defined bass. Vocal reproduction is also slightly better. It also has a slighter blacker background at this point.
But, the Saturn also sounds "sugar-coated" and "soft around the edges", in the mids and highs and lacks the attack transient response of the Marantz.
The Marantz sounds bigger, deeper, more detailed, open, more extended in the highs, faster, punchier, and has better body on pianos and violins than the Saturn at this point.
The Marantz is very slightly more forward, more strident, and just a touch edgier than the Saturn, but its detail, clarity, and the organic body of certain insruments is very addictive indeed.
Considering the huge price difference, the Saturns stellar reputation, and the rave reviews from owners and reviewers, I was expecting the Saturn to be quite a big step-up sonically from the Marantz, but its NOT, at least not right now, IMHO.
If I did not own the Marantz SA8001, I imagine that I would be blown away by the Saturn, but the Marantz is a really great sounding unit, and holds its own very well indeed, at least at this point in time.
I am having high hopes that my Saturn will show big improvements between now and the end of next week. If it does not, I guess I will keep the Marantz.
First, the good news: I received my Rega Saturn yesterday and its been burning in ever since.
The bad news: I am not that impressed with it as of yet.
At this point, I like the sound of my Marantz SA8001 better, believe it or not, especially using my new Signal Cable Silver Resolution Reference Interconnects from the Marantz SA8001 to my HeadAmp GS-1 headphone amp!
The Saturn is warmer, smoother, and more laid-back than the Marantz, and has slightly tighter and better defined bass. Vocal reproduction is also slightly better. It also has a slighter blacker background at this point.
But, the Saturn also sounds "sugar-coated" and "soft around the edges", in the mids and highs and lacks the attack transient response of the Marantz.
The Marantz sounds bigger, deeper, more detailed, open, more extended in the highs, faster, punchier, and has better body on pianos and violins than the Saturn at this point.
The Marantz is very slightly more forward, more strident, and just a touch edgier than the Saturn, but its detail, clarity, and the organic body of certain insruments is very addictive indeed.
Considering the huge price difference, the Saturns stellar reputation, and the rave reviews from owners and reviewers, I was expecting the Saturn to be quite a big step-up sonically from the Marantz, but its NOT, at least not right now, IMHO.
If I did not own the Marantz SA8001, I imagine that I would be blown away by the Saturn, but the Marantz is a really great sounding unit, and holds its own very well indeed, at least at this point in time.
I am having high hopes that my Saturn will show big improvements between now and the end of next week. If it does not, I guess I will keep the Marantz.
