Quote:
Originally Posted by nfusion770 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
They seem to work well with the canon tanks, but I have had nothing but trouble with other models. It's much less of a hassle to purchase new.
|
Hey. Nothing about your post, but your avatar reminded me of Leaf House. First song I've heard from them.
As for the inks. It would really depend on the purpose of the printouts. If these are just for you or for nothing of the professional or academic sort, then the quality should be sufficient. However there are some things to consider:
1. Depending on your brand of ink cartridge the refilling process can be difficult and messy. Some are easier to fill than others.
2. The quality of the ink, of course, does not usually match that of genuine manufacturer ink. Factors like being fade-resistant, not smearing, quick drying and overall just more vivid seem to be tied to genuine ink.
3. You might have to modify your ink detection system since some ink tanks, once "finished" may not be recognized by the printer or computer even though they are refilled. Some sort of counter I think. However, I am basing this on an older Epson printer.
I personally don't use refillable ink myself since its not worth all that hassle and decline of quality when the genuine inks are not that expensive. When buying a printer you should always factor in ink cost and output.
My setup is an inexpensive hp monochrome laser printer and a Canon Pixma for color. The toner on the laser lasts me about 1 year and a half with regular usage. The separate color and black inks in the Canon lasts >6 months for me. Mind you, I don't print photos on it.
Cheers.