Recommend me a media player

Jun 5, 2007 at 4:37 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 21

dj_mocok

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Posts
5,635
Likes
15
I used to use very old version of winamp to play my MP3s, but is there any better player out there? I heard of foobar, but not sure how good it is.

Basically all I want is a player that:
- plays mp3
- very light on resource (not a system hog or takes ages to load&close)
- no spyware
- no registration needed
- no trying-to-connect-to-internet-by-itself
- sounds good? or do they all sound the same?

Any recommendation? (and which version is best)? Thanks!
 
Jun 5, 2007 at 4:51 PM Post #5 of 21
I'm using Windows XP.
So I guess it's either foobar or winamp huh? Which one (also version) is less resource hog?

I don't need bells and whistles and all that. Don't need video or internet features or fancy plugins..
 
Jun 5, 2007 at 4:56 PM Post #6 of 21
Foobar it is then. Winamp has way too much stuff and useless crap in the most recent release.
And Foobar is pretty resource friendly. Takes around 2% on average of CPU power for me.
 
Jun 6, 2007 at 1:49 AM Post #11 of 21
fooooobar! i <3 foobar... SO customizable. it's virtually impossible to not get it set up just the way you like it. i find it to be quite light on resources as well
 
Jun 6, 2007 at 2:52 AM Post #12 of 21
same here, after heavy skinning (which is not default) I run about 30MB of memory and still 0% cpu...
 
Jun 6, 2007 at 3:16 AM Post #13 of 21
I got and installed Foobar latest version. It only uses 10,000K memory.

Mine looks so plain I thought it's a notepad, lol.

But yeah, it is costumisable, it's so flexible, I have no idea what those options are. The only one I know is change color and fonts, hehe..

By the way, how do we change IDE taqs using Foobar?
 
Jun 7, 2007 at 2:39 PM Post #14 of 21
It really depends on what you want to do with the player. If all you are doing is storing your music by artist/album and then navigating to an album that you want to listen to, then just about any player will work fine.

If at times, you can't decide what specific album you'd like to hear, but you are in the mood for some mellow jazz, then maybe something with more advanced playlist capabilities would be better. Using the mellow jazz example, the program I use, J.River Media Center, has a pretty good database feature. Of course it includes all the IDE tags as fields, including genre. However, it can do a lot more. First of all, you can define your own fields. If you want sub-genres, that are not part of the normal IDE tags, you can create your own. But my collection is fairly large and it would be pretty tedious to go through everything to edit the tags. JRMC also has a utility that will analyze your audio and calculate the beats-per-minute (BPM) and intensity (along with a few other things). So, if you know a track that you would consider mellow, you could use its settings as a basis for other mellow tracks. That might be something like a BPM less than 60 and intensity less than 2 (the scales used vary depending on each field, so something like intensity uses a scale of 1 to 5). Now I can have JRMC automatically create a playlist with the title "Mellow Jazz" by selecting all tracks from the genre "Jazz" OR "Vocal" AND a BPM < 60 AND Intensity < 2. If I want to play this list in random order, I need to add a randomizer to the list of arguments. JRMC also keeps track of when a CD or track was added to the library; when it was last played; and how many times it's been played. So, I can also add these arguments like "haven't played for a month" or "haven't listened to". You can also set limits to the length of a playlist. So the "Mellow Jazz" playlist can be limited to 90 minutes or something. Now anytime I add music to the library, JRMC will analyze the tracks and automatically tag the music from their online database. Every time I click the "Mellow Jazz" playlists, it will apply my criteria and display a new 90 minute randomly sorted list of mellow jazz tracks that I haven't heard in a month.

Their autoplaylist feature is very advanced. It can do a lot more than I've described in this post and it is not very difficult to learn. It's fun to use and listen to music based on whatever criteria you can come up with. It's kind of like your own personal radio, but much, much better. The only problem I have with JRMC is it supports other features like video, TV, and photography. I don't use those features because I prefer other apps for that functionality, so it seems like a waste. I've been looking at a pure music players, like Foobar2000, but none of them have JRMC advanced playlist power. Windows Media Player and iTunes fall far short of this and last I checked they were really slow with large databases and JRMC is very fast. Does anyone know of a "audio-only" player that has these advanced playlist capabilities?
 
Jun 8, 2007 at 10:21 AM Post #15 of 21
Foobar
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top