Ray Samuel Tomahawk, anything similar?
Oct 13, 2008 at 11:01 PM Post #16 of 90
Quote:

Originally Posted by wynn /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I agree that this amp has the same idea as Ray, but its sound is different.


If it is a public domain circuit or a different one, then no big deal on the circuit. If. . . On the chassis, it is a near copy and there is no excuse for that.
 
Oct 14, 2008 at 12:31 AM Post #17 of 90
Quote:

Originally Posted by wynn /img/forum/go_quote.gif
There is an amp call Mina (made by chinese).
It has the same size as the Tomahawk.
I have tried them once and it sounds even better than tomahawk with cheaper price.
As I remember, you can send them your own picture to laser-etch on the amp.
45683545200809080110362126603363217_001.jpg

45683545200809080110362126603363217_007.jpg

45683545200809080110362126603363217_002.jpg

45683545200809080110362126603363217_008.jpg




Wow....JUST WOW....Can't belive it. Even my custom volume knob....
Ray Samuels
 
Oct 14, 2008 at 1:02 AM Post #18 of 90
So Ray, you finally have started to produce over seas? :^)
 
Oct 14, 2008 at 1:22 AM Post #20 of 90
Well none the less, I'm going with the Tomahawk, now just to decide on which IEM's I want for my portable setup.

What are the dimensions of the Hornet and Tomahawk anyway? Ray you should put that on the site, if it's not already on there already, I'm blind maybe.
 
Oct 14, 2008 at 1:39 AM Post #21 of 90
Quote:

Originally Posted by RTTR /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Well none the less, I'm going with the Tomahawk, now just to decide on which IEM's I want for my portable setup.

What are the dimensions of the Hornet and Tomahawk anyway? Ray you should put that on the site, if it's not already on there already, I'm blind maybe.



The hawk is tiny, w - 1.75", h - 0.75", d - 3.125" (vol. knob incl.). Excellent dynamics & control. On loud passages, it does not congest much. Amazing for such a small amp and 2 AAA batteries.
 
Oct 14, 2008 at 2:09 AM Post #22 of 90
I think that one of the greatest things about the Tomahawk( despite its SQ that I can't opine on, since I've never tried it ) is its batery life. 2 AAA's that can last hundreds of hours is just amazing.

But I'll get a Headsix. I'll contribute with head-fi foruns and it will be cheaper.
 
Oct 14, 2008 at 1:27 PM Post #25 of 90
oh my god @ the mina... Nice box though
wink.gif


no one has recommenced the pico or even the predator (even though it costs $$ because of the dac which the op may no need) what gives?
 
Oct 15, 2008 at 10:25 PM Post #29 of 90
Quote:

Originally Posted by DeltaX5 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Ray Samuels should make a clone of the Tomahawk but without a DAC. This way there would be a cheeper alternative. Not all of use need or want a DAC from a portable.


The Tomahawk doesn't have a DAC.
 
Oct 15, 2008 at 10:27 PM Post #30 of 90
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kerby88 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Why not look into the headamp PICO w/o DAC? Is it still an option? I believe the price and size are nearly identical to the Tomahawk.


I believe the Pico is much larger than the Tomahawk.

Not many amps can touch the Tomahawk in terms of size.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top