ryanjsoo
Reviewer for The Headphone List
ryanjsoo's Reviews
Well flinkenick did mention that frequencies are relative should be compared to its surrounding frequencies, so using Inner Fidelity's graph.. If the audeze EQ has a +15 rise in the 2-3 khz region, and the raw measurement of the iSine20 shows a -5 dB regression at 2.5khz relative to it's 1.5khz peak, I would imagine what this EQ does -- even if it does NOT directly alter the 1.5khz bump, this increase to the 2-3khz region would indeed remove the 1.5khz peak and shift it towards the 2-3khz area. So sure, the EQ doesn't "lower" the 1.5khz region, but by increasing the depression after the 1.5khz region it more or less gives the same effect ...
One side is saying the 1.5khz peak is bad, the other is saying 1.5khz has nothing to do with it sounding bad, blah blah bla
If you want to compare frequencies relatively, then applying the EQ will make 2-3khz the peak of the graph. Audeze's EQ will remove that 1.5khz peak, regardless of whether they altered the 1.5khz frequency or not.
So saying "audeze's EQ doesn't even change the 1.5khz region" should not really be used as evidence of whether the 1.5khz is the issue or not.
I think Nic is more concerned that Crin and co suggest that a certain spike in a particular frequency range has an absolute effect on the sound when, like anything, that is not the case. It could have that effect in this instance, but it is misleading to say that X produces Y effect because that's how it is, that's what others say. Everything in audio is relative and almost every frequency range interacts with each other. It isn't that measurement gear is inaccurate or Crin's interpretation is incorrect.
Last edited: