NightWoundsTime
A nice hunk of young man
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2004
- Posts
- 2,551
- Likes
- 12
Just stumbled across an interesting website that claims to be able to track demographics of visitors to any place on the internet. A bit scary but of course I had to see what they say about Head-fi....
http://www.quantcast.com/head-fi.org
Certainly not accurate but interesting nonetheless. What's funny is that it doesn't report any users as "addicts", which I think most posting members should be called. They define addict as 30 or more visits per month...
I think the demographics are read as percentages of the average web demographics. I don't really doubt that we're at 468% of the average asian population. The 4% number on African-American visitation is a bit shocking though.
It's way askew though that 12at7 an 12au7 are our top keywords? What? From there though the list looks pretty accurate (maybe they just figure in the extreme rarity of a "word" like 12at7 to the score.)
Edit: Yeah that looks like the answer. A score of 300 would mean we were 3 times as likely to type 12at7 than an average user. 10925 must mean we're 109.25 times more likely. Fair enough
.
http://www.quantcast.com/head-fi.org
Certainly not accurate but interesting nonetheless. What's funny is that it doesn't report any users as "addicts", which I think most posting members should be called. They define addict as 30 or more visits per month...
I think the demographics are read as percentages of the average web demographics. I don't really doubt that we're at 468% of the average asian population. The 4% number on African-American visitation is a bit shocking though.
It's way askew though that 12at7 an 12au7 are our top keywords? What? From there though the list looks pretty accurate (maybe they just figure in the extreme rarity of a "word" like 12at7 to the score.)
Edit: Yeah that looks like the answer. A score of 300 would mean we were 3 times as likely to type 12at7 than an average user. 10925 must mean we're 109.25 times more likely. Fair enough