PS1000 Impressions Thread
Jun 21, 2014 at 9:42 PM Post #901 of 3,602

MacedonianHero

Headphone.Guru Editor
Joined
Feb 26, 2009
Posts
17,998
Likes
4,321
Location
Toronto, Canada
Well..I've had my PS1000e headphones for a few days now and I was able to A-B them to my (now sold) PS1000s and here are some of my findings:
 
Physical Differences:
Not much to report here. The drivers are red and 50mm in the PS1000e and the cable is thicker (12 conductors vs. 8). Oh and the new models state "PS1000e"
tongue.gif
. Beyond that, I can't really find any differences. For a full listing of the changes, I'll simply refer you to the Grado website:
 
http://www.gradolabs.com/headphones/professional-series/item/23-ps1000e
 

PS1000 on the left and PS1000e on the right
 
Now onto the important stuff...how do they compare sonically...
 
Well, the PS1000e's have retained the classic Grado sound and they just rock! As well, they are voiced very closely to each other. Right off the bat, you'll notice that the PS1000e are slightly more efficient (99.8dB vs 98dB), so you'll have to turn down your volume knob a wee bit with the newer Grados to volume match. 
 
Some of my test tracks used:
Led Zeppelin I, II, III (new 2014 remasters)
Perfect Circle: Thirteenth Step
Pink Floyd DSoTM and WYWH (2011 remasters)
U2 Joshua Tree
 
Setup used:
CDs played through my Cambridge Audio CDP --> Bryston BDA-2 DAC --> GS-X Mk2
 
As I mentioned, both headphones sound like PS1000s, but the new "e" versions have bass that seems a bit more controlled and goes down a bit deeper. One thing that has limited Grados has been their sub-bass performance; especially when I compare them to the Audeze headphones I have on hand (LCD-X and LCD-XC), but the newer PS1000e's do an admirable job. Again, the differences between these and the original PS1000s are not night and day in this department, but during my frequency sweeps, I was happily surprised by the PS1000e's performance down low. 
 
The mids are classic Grado, yes there's a bit of a "U" with these headphones (like the PS1000s and RS1/RS1is), but the music just flows from these headphones and I can't stop smiling. 
smile.gif


 
The treble on both the PS1000 and PS1000e was very similarly voiced to my ears and sometimes very difficult to tell the differences. So it's very hard for me to comment further on these differences. But all I can say is that the treble can be a bit much if your amp/dac/source/music is tilted that way. It's kept me away from these headphones for quite some time. Then I got to hear them in my home on my setup and all I can say is that is definitely no longer the case.
 
One area that was a bit more of a profound change was the sound staging. I was surprised to immediately hear the very good imaging capabilities of the PS1000e's. They are very expansive when called for with some orchestral music I used, but when needed with some Zeppelin or Sabbath, they were still upfront and just rocked! The PS1000s offer a very good amount of sound staging, but the PS1000e's have kicked this up a notch and aren't too far behind my HD800s in that regard.
 
Both the PS1000 and PS1000e are fantastic headphones and worthy flagships for the company. I'm pleased to see Grado continue to improve their product offerings with the new "e"nhancements. 
 
Jun 21, 2014 at 9:49 PM Post #902 of 3,602

whirlwind

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Posts
10,831
Likes
15,766
Location
At The Crossroads
Thanks for that review...sounds like it is a winner for sure 
smile.gif

 
Jun 21, 2014 at 9:58 PM Post #904 of 3,602

kvtaco17

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Mar 29, 2013
Posts
1,667
Likes
134
Crap now I want one...
 
Jun 21, 2014 at 10:21 PM Post #907 of 3,602

jaywillin

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Posts
5,930
Likes
1,087
Location
Alabama
very nice write up
so far, from all the preliminary reports i've seen are very favorable it seems grado has really done a nice job
 
Jun 22, 2014 at 12:05 AM Post #909 of 3,602

chirawatf

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Posts
165
Likes
15
Location
Udonthani, Thailand
Thank you very much for your impression, MacedonianHero.
 
I'm also have LCD-X and PS1000 (chrome) and I obviously feel that PS1000 has more distortion than LCD-X that leads to sibilance problems.  Could you please comment your feeling regard to sonic distortion of PS1000e, is it better in this aspect?
 
Thanks.
 
Jun 22, 2014 at 9:13 PM Post #911 of 3,602

MacedonianHero

Headphone.Guru Editor
Joined
Feb 26, 2009
Posts
17,998
Likes
4,321
Location
Toronto, Canada
  Thank you very much for your impression, MacedonianHero.
 
I'm also have LCD-X and PS1000 (chrome) and I obviously feel that PS1000 has more distortion than LCD-X that leads to sibilance problems.  Could you please comment your feeling regard to sonic distortion of PS1000e, is it better in this aspect?
 
Thanks.

 
If one listens at moderate or moderately loud levels, both the PS1000 and PS1000e are both fine. Crank up the volume to 90dB+, then you'll hear distortion (especially in the sub-bass region; especially when compared to the LCD-X or LCX-XC (just an advantage one has with orthos vs. traditional dynamic headphones). That said, I did hear a bit less "distortion" in the in sub-bass region with the PS1000e's.
  Could you show them side-by-side driver side up with the pads off?
 
I want to see how different the new 50mm driver looks from the old 40mm one!

Sorry, this is as good as it gets as the PS1000s are off to their new owner:
 

PS1000e
 

PS1000
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top