Post Your Photography Here #2
Sep 10, 2008 at 1:49 AM Post #2,896 of 15,521
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hayduke /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I disagree with Ken Rockwell that a medium format camera is needed to take quality landscape pictures.


If your serious about your landscape photography, you need medium or large format.
Sharpness, sharpness, sharpness.
Detail, detail, detail.
 
Sep 10, 2008 at 5:10 PM Post #2,897 of 15,521
Quote:

Originally Posted by Towert7 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
If your serious about your landscape photography, you need medium or large format.
Sharpness, sharpness, sharpness.
Detail, detail, detail.



While medium or large may be preferred, I think even with digital you can get sharpness and detail. While most just stitch together across the horizontal plane, I've seen lots of landscape pictures that have been stitched across the horizontal and vertical planes and these images have LOTS of detail.
 
Sep 12, 2008 at 10:09 PM Post #2,898 of 15,521
1027082_151410_16e669394a_p.jpg


1027222_151410_16e669394a_p.jpg
 
Sep 13, 2008 at 5:16 PM Post #2,899 of 15,521
Epic first shot, Agnostic.

Just got this back from the lab. (Nikon FE, Nikkor-S 50mm 1.4, Superia 800)

2853692806_bd3af1a161.jpg


2852858945_9d471b1216.jpg


2852859957_59e723d35d.jpg
 
Sep 14, 2008 at 7:13 AM Post #2,900 of 15,521
Could'nt make it to Noah's Ark cause of school work ;( In the end went down to MuttsNMittens later that day instead to do some shooting for them.

Hannibal has a name which doesn't suit his personality at all. He is a very sweet dog that loves a good pat but is unfortunately quite ill. He could’nt even sit up for long has he would grow tired quicky. Managed to squeeze out some quick portraits before he got too tired.







I seem to like b/w alot these few days..


More at Furry-Photos.com
 
Sep 15, 2008 at 11:23 AM Post #2,901 of 15,521
hannibal's so cute ! :)

2854727565_89669d15ec.jpg


2855541586_7f3c7198cd.jpg
 
Sep 15, 2008 at 8:54 PM Post #2,902 of 15,521
 
Sep 16, 2008 at 3:21 AM Post #2,904 of 15,521
So pretty


Commonwealth Ave.


Computer Science seminar Room


Sky Gradation


Right out of Doom 3


It's funny how each one of us brings something a little unique to this thread. We each have our own distinct styles.
 
Sep 16, 2008 at 8:12 PM Post #2,907 of 15,521
Yay!!!

view larger

The chalk board right after one of my classes.
Photo taken with a POS phone camera.

Any guess which class?
 
Sep 16, 2008 at 9:52 PM Post #2,908 of 15,521
No idea. But Towert, how do you set your contrast for your photos? They always look almost surreal because of it, and I love it. Even in your low quality photo the lighting looks stunning.
 
Sep 16, 2008 at 10:19 PM Post #2,909 of 15,521
Quote:

Originally Posted by flamerz /img/forum/go_quote.gif
No idea. But Towert, how do you set your contrast for your photos? They always look almost surreal because of it, and I love it. Even in your low quality photo the lighting looks stunning.


Thank you very much for that nice comment flamerz!


The last photo (low quality) was taken with a phone camera with the settings fixed (not able to be changed). It's for a research project in the computer science department at my college. So I can't take credit for that one.

For my other pictures though: I have the in camera settings for contrast and saturation set on high. My camera is a few years old, so my high setting is a little tame compared to what you can get out of some of the new nikons.

If the lighting was ideal, the pictures I get out of the camera are pretty much what you see me post. All that may be needed is an 'auto brightness' in photoshop to stretch the dynamic range all the way from black to white.

If the lighting is less than ideal, my pictures fall into two main categories.
They can either be over saturated, or under saturated.
For my typical under saturated images, I'll use software to change the image. It usually involves me changing the curves, by pulling down the mid tones (darkening them), clipping the highs a little if there is enough dynamic range available without loosing too much detail, and increasing the darks ever so slightly.
For most images, this amounts to something very similar to what "auto levels" would give in photoshop, but for others I put a little more work into it.

If the image is oversaturated, I'll try and pull back some detail in the shadows and highlights. I essentially try and stretch the dynamic range to get less contrast.

And of course, for each image if I see something little that can be improved, I'll do selective edits to it.

So to sum up. My best photos seem to be the ones where the lighting was ideal when taking the picture. If lighting is not ideal, I can do edits to it in software to make it a little more interesting and approach what ideal lighting would have given me. I basically set my saturation and contrast up high in the camera settings. Newer DSLR's it would be a mid setting. It also helps to have a lens that captures colors nicely.

I simply try and match what I see in real life as best I can.
If you want more specifics, just let me know.

Thank you again.
 
Sep 16, 2008 at 10:45 PM Post #2,910 of 15,521
Quote:

Originally Posted by flamerz /img/forum/go_quote.gif
No idea. But Towert, how do you set your contrast for your photos? They always look almost surreal because of it, and I love it. Even in your low quality photo the lighting looks stunning.


If I may?

This is probably what I would do to this photo, more or less, (probably a little less for the yellow brightness)
2863220597_9b6e8bda5f_o.jpg


It basically amounts to compressing the dynamics to make the image more saturated and darker. The image itself is very nice to begin with.

By the way, I simply LOVE this color scheme (subtracting some colors from the yellows to make them look pinkish):
2864062260_ff3231ee71_o.jpg

LOVE the colors here!!!

[size=xx-small](If you want me to remove these 2 pictures, just let me know.)[/size]
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top