[cormann]

I'm sure this poll has been done before, but I'm curious to see currently what type of tech people prefer.
 
I often read on this forum about how Balanced Armature and Dynamic Driver IEMs produce a different sound signature. Dynamic Drivers are generally described as warm, while Balanced Armatures are analytical - among other differences. Assuming that this is true, which sound signature do you prefer? If you'd like, please explain your reasoning. Also, if you believe that the differences aren't real and simply perpetuated by the audiophile community, please say so as well.

 

[jasonb]

i just got my first ever BA IEM yesterday, and i can't say that i hear a distinctly different sound out of them that i can blame them being BA on.

 

[goodvibes]

There are tendencies but you can find examples of warm BAs and analytical dynamics. I wouldn't pre judge anything based on driver tech. Quality examples would be the REO dynamic being too analytical for some and Final Audio single BAs which are reported to be wide band and nicely textured in the bass.

 

[jasonb]

Quote:

There are tendencies but you can find examples of warm BAs and analytical dynamics. I wouldn't pre judge anything based on driver tech. Quality examples would be the REO dynamic being too analytical for some and Final Audio single BAs which are reported to be wide band and nicely textured in the bass.

add the Sleek Audio SA6 to that list. i wasn't expecting such deep and powerful bass from a single BA IEM.

 

[lebomb]

BA's sound a bit cold to me.  I tend to like a warmer sound..........kind of like an LP used to give. 

 

[QuantumXL]

I like BA drivers at first. But it was difficult to say after I listened to the MD tribute turbines. I like the versatility that BA drivers bring, but I love how smooth Dynamic drivers can deliver a sound. The verdict will be my new UM TF18s that are coming in. Super excited. Or is that totally off topic. Okay maybe a tad.

 

[TCD1975]

Just based on the IEMs I've personally heard I find that BAs are faster, more accurate, more detailed with better clarity and separation.

 

[Photofan1986]

Useless question IMO. Simple example: SM3 vs RE-252. BA vs Dynamic. The RE-252 are dryer, faster, have less bass, are more accurate are as detailed and have better transparency. The BA SM3 have more bass weight, are somewhat slower, have lots of warmth, a bigger soundstage... I would say exactly the opposite of the general prejudice on the matter.
 
I dont't think that today (it may have been true a while ago), those differences only come down to the technology used. Manufacturers can make BA iems with "dynamic" characteristics, and the opposite is true.

 

[Gastronomic]

Ba! For some reason customs are ba.
Someone correct me if i'm wrong..

 

[Photofan1986]

There are several dynamic customs out there, but they cannot provide the same level of isolation as a BA iem can.

 

[Gastronomic]

ok. thank you for the info.

 

[Woozle Wuzzle]

How about both of both worlds? The Moving Armature is fantastic with such products as the Ortofon eQ7

 

[Rip N' Burn]

Having owned/listened to many types of BA and Dynamic iems, I can honestly say it totally depends on the quality of the drivers and how they are tuned regardless if they are BA or dynamic. The RE0 and IE8 use dynamic drivers but yet they sound very different. More often than not, dynamic driver iems are vented so they wont isolate as well as most BA iems.

 

[mugen3]

Dynamic. I'm a bit of a basshead. BA just don't move enough air and lack weight.

 

[Vault101]

I don't notice a very big difference between two kind of drivers.