yfei
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2002
- Posts
- 453
- Likes
- 211
I compared 963sa to NAD c540:
The 963sa has about 20 days burn-in time, c540 is very old.
headphone: HD580
Music are: Telarc SACD sampler I (mostly jazz, blues), Telarc 1812 CD and SACD, Dark side of the moon SACD, misc Pop, Hip-pop, Rock, Metal, classical CDs.
1. tremble of 963sa is really good! extended, pleasing, without any harsh.
2. 963sa has more details (except in low bass). space image is more accurate.
3. 96k and 192k upsampling, i don't like them, gut feeling is the sound lost some details and texture and some frequency range (I guess 5kHz~10kHz) is blurred when upsampling on. Without upsampling the redbook is very good.
4. using either CD or SACD, lower bass of 963sa is muddy, blurred, I feel something is wrong.
I don't think 963sa lacks of bass, because when I tried Festival Coronation March in the Telarc 1812 SACD, I really shocked by the bass which goes deep and powerful, c540 can't match. But I tend to feel that 963sa's bass is muddy, blurred. (that track can not reveal this problem, because bass is prolonged in that track) The fast deep drums, deep bass guiltars sound burry, unreal in 963sa.
5. c540 put more emotion into the music, the tremble and bass has much more energy than 963sa. I think 963sa is more close to the truth, but less emotion there.
6. [963sa is more sensitive to CDRs, I can hear alot of 'pi','pa' noises in some CDRs, just like very very dirty LP. Old c540 has almost no noise, but sometimes skips.] - I take that back, after trying more CDRs, I found 963sa is better. NAD c540 has a lot of noise on most golden, silver and green CDRs (like TDK, Sumsung ...), only no noise on Verbertine Super AZO blue CDRs. while 963sa is the very opposite: no noise on most CDRs, only has noise on Super AZO discs. (and, most of my music CDRs are Verbertine)
final word: To me, the bass of 963sa is the biggest problem, but overall it is better than NAD c540 on redbook playback.
The 963sa has about 20 days burn-in time, c540 is very old.
headphone: HD580
Music are: Telarc SACD sampler I (mostly jazz, blues), Telarc 1812 CD and SACD, Dark side of the moon SACD, misc Pop, Hip-pop, Rock, Metal, classical CDs.
1. tremble of 963sa is really good! extended, pleasing, without any harsh.
2. 963sa has more details (except in low bass). space image is more accurate.
3. 96k and 192k upsampling, i don't like them, gut feeling is the sound lost some details and texture and some frequency range (I guess 5kHz~10kHz) is blurred when upsampling on. Without upsampling the redbook is very good.
4. using either CD or SACD, lower bass of 963sa is muddy, blurred, I feel something is wrong.
I don't think 963sa lacks of bass, because when I tried Festival Coronation March in the Telarc 1812 SACD, I really shocked by the bass which goes deep and powerful, c540 can't match. But I tend to feel that 963sa's bass is muddy, blurred. (that track can not reveal this problem, because bass is prolonged in that track) The fast deep drums, deep bass guiltars sound burry, unreal in 963sa.
5. c540 put more emotion into the music, the tremble and bass has much more energy than 963sa. I think 963sa is more close to the truth, but less emotion there.
6. [963sa is more sensitive to CDRs, I can hear alot of 'pi','pa' noises in some CDRs, just like very very dirty LP. Old c540 has almost no noise, but sometimes skips.] - I take that back, after trying more CDRs, I found 963sa is better. NAD c540 has a lot of noise on most golden, silver and green CDRs (like TDK, Sumsung ...), only no noise on Verbertine Super AZO blue CDRs. while 963sa is the very opposite: no noise on most CDRs, only has noise on Super AZO discs. (and, most of my music CDRs are Verbertine)
final word: To me, the bass of 963sa is the biggest problem, but overall it is better than NAD c540 on redbook playback.