Opinions sought, My rebuttal to critics in Sound Science
Apr 6, 2018 at 11:56 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 8

skwoodwiva

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 13, 2018
Posts
561
Likes
29
Location
LA
I was blocked by members reports to
https://www.head-fi.org/members/castleofargh.188025/.
Butt hurt? Only a little.
Integrity slighted, majorly!

Yet my part was always sound scrutiny with science in mind, yet listening experience to me trumps science when the two are at odds.

This op is all about where science and audiophile scrutiny meet.
Relevant posts from blocked thread

Showing a members claim is counter to all known audiophile norms
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/bre...he-final-verdict.599924/page-28#post-14153131
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/bre...he-final-verdict.599924/page-29#post-14153150

My confession used against me.
And my correction to a sound hypothesis!!!
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/bre...he-final-verdict.599924/page-28#post-14153060


Evidence
My rash, not sufficiently narrowed conjecture. Yet true in part.
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/bre...he-final-verdict.599924/page-27#post-14152881
 
Last edited:
Apr 7, 2018 at 8:55 AM Post #7 of 8
Apr 7, 2018 at 10:05 AM Post #8 of 8
the sound science guys have numbers and specs to back them up.....if you are gonna hang out there you have to supply evidence for anything you might challenge them on...their forum..their rules my friend
I was careful to say essentially what BigShot was doing, just showing off equipment. This one https://www.head-fi.org/threads/new-concept-in-improving-audio-quality.876044/page-2#post-14155142

I never realized fone's methods were actually evidence in my favor.

Also the notice above the DIY cable forum, banning science guys.
I will let them be, to a point. But outrageous non supported claims? Will get the same from me, just ever so polite or at least equal to theirs.
Herring!
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top