TimSchirmer
Repelling digital infidels. (Would that be called the Digifadah?)
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2001
- Posts
- 3,246
- Likes
- 82
An Open Letter to Rolling Stone
by Maya Price
(This letter was written to rolling stone after their "women
in "rock" issue was published, but was not printed by their editors.)
-------------------------------------------
I tried to find some cleverly worded way to express my disgust with
your "Women in Rock" issue, but what i have to say is really quite
simple: You guys are completely dumb.
By RS standards, Rock is no longer a style of music but a trendy
costume to be whipped up by expensive stylists and slapped onto the
latest pop tart barbie doll. Give a girl some tight pants and a spiky
bracelet and POOF! She ROCKS!
Your poor choice of cover girls and featured artists brings to mind
the Sports Illustrated swimsuit editions. There is nothing
necessarily wrong with the breast-baring models inside..but we all
understand that they have NOTHING TO DO WITH SPORTS--Which just might
be offensive to women who are interested in sports or who might even
be (gasp) real athletes.
Yes, Britney has a talented stylist and yes, somebody gave Shakira a
Guns & Roses t-shirt to wear..but they ARE NOT NOW NOR WILL THEY EVER
BE ROCK.
Maybe it's naive of me to expect any glimmer of rock'n'roll
credibility OR respect for women from a magazine whose cover shot is
regularly a naked underweight actress. The thing is , I AM a woman
musician with a rock band, and as we all are I am STARVED for any
little crumb of recognition that real women rockers might be thrown.
So like a sucker I find myself short another five bucks ..and pissed
enough to write my first letter to an editor. Avril Lavigne gets some
studded accessories from Hot Topic so now she's "upholding the brazen
tradition of teenage outrage"???!! Are you SERIOUS? And could someone
please explain to me why people keep insisting on referring to PINK
as rock? Wasn't she doing the white girl hip hop thing a minute ago?
Yeah, she performed on the Aerosmith tribute show --big deal..she was
on the Janet Jackson tribute show just before that--whatever's
trendy. WHO CARES. She's a Spice Girl reject...but I digress.
Jewel and Mandy friggin' Moore have full page features as Rock
Icons...Meanwhile Joan Jett gets one line. ONE LINE. Joan Jett & the
Blackhearts, who have never stopped touring, recently did 10 days in
the Middle East playing for the troops stationed in Afghanistan. In
AFGHANISTAN, Joan would come onstage wearing a birkha, which she
ripped off and stomped on before blazing through the purest and
nastiest rock show ANYWHERE. But even in the RS WOMEN IN ROCK issue,
a story like that gets ONE SENTENCE on the bottom of the last page of
Random Notes.
Britney's Rock credentials? Well, she butchers the song "I Love
Rock'n'Roll" on her latest record, and when asked about it the genius
replies "Well, I've always loved Pat Benatar." And SHE is your Rock
issue cover girl?? You should be REALLY embarrassed.
Sleater Kinney was the only rock group listed on the cover..and they
got only half a page. Ashanti, the r&b back up singer who can't seem
to do anything without "featuring Jah Rule," has two pages.
What about the Donnas? The Yeah Yeah Yeahs? The Distillers? A mag
like RS has the power to shine important light on groups like these--
instead they are afterthoughts, and that valuable spotlight is wasted
on the same overexposed pop princesses WHO HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH
ROCK.
In your own letter from the editor you have the hypocritical balls to
say "rock radio won't touch female artists, while the pop factory
keeps churning out soundalike clones, and ambitious musicians with
something to say find themselves left out in the cold."
The pages that follow those words are a blatant display that Rolling
Stone magazine is happily working for the factory now too.
If the issue had been called "Women in Music"..or maybe "Some Cute
Girls with Top 10 Records out Right Now"..I would have no beef with
it. Corny as it may sound, ROCK is something which is still
meaningful and even sacred to some of us. Use the word "rock" in bold
letters next to a picture of Britney ****ing Spears, and you're
turning your whole publication into a joke...and an offensive joke at
that.
by Maya Price
(This letter was written to rolling stone after their "women
in "rock" issue was published, but was not printed by their editors.)
-------------------------------------------
I tried to find some cleverly worded way to express my disgust with
your "Women in Rock" issue, but what i have to say is really quite
simple: You guys are completely dumb.
By RS standards, Rock is no longer a style of music but a trendy
costume to be whipped up by expensive stylists and slapped onto the
latest pop tart barbie doll. Give a girl some tight pants and a spiky
bracelet and POOF! She ROCKS!
Your poor choice of cover girls and featured artists brings to mind
the Sports Illustrated swimsuit editions. There is nothing
necessarily wrong with the breast-baring models inside..but we all
understand that they have NOTHING TO DO WITH SPORTS--Which just might
be offensive to women who are interested in sports or who might even
be (gasp) real athletes.
Yes, Britney has a talented stylist and yes, somebody gave Shakira a
Guns & Roses t-shirt to wear..but they ARE NOT NOW NOR WILL THEY EVER
BE ROCK.
Maybe it's naive of me to expect any glimmer of rock'n'roll
credibility OR respect for women from a magazine whose cover shot is
regularly a naked underweight actress. The thing is , I AM a woman
musician with a rock band, and as we all are I am STARVED for any
little crumb of recognition that real women rockers might be thrown.
So like a sucker I find myself short another five bucks ..and pissed
enough to write my first letter to an editor. Avril Lavigne gets some
studded accessories from Hot Topic so now she's "upholding the brazen
tradition of teenage outrage"???!! Are you SERIOUS? And could someone
please explain to me why people keep insisting on referring to PINK
as rock? Wasn't she doing the white girl hip hop thing a minute ago?
Yeah, she performed on the Aerosmith tribute show --big deal..she was
on the Janet Jackson tribute show just before that--whatever's
trendy. WHO CARES. She's a Spice Girl reject...but I digress.
Jewel and Mandy friggin' Moore have full page features as Rock
Icons...Meanwhile Joan Jett gets one line. ONE LINE. Joan Jett & the
Blackhearts, who have never stopped touring, recently did 10 days in
the Middle East playing for the troops stationed in Afghanistan. In
AFGHANISTAN, Joan would come onstage wearing a birkha, which she
ripped off and stomped on before blazing through the purest and
nastiest rock show ANYWHERE. But even in the RS WOMEN IN ROCK issue,
a story like that gets ONE SENTENCE on the bottom of the last page of
Random Notes.
Britney's Rock credentials? Well, she butchers the song "I Love
Rock'n'Roll" on her latest record, and when asked about it the genius
replies "Well, I've always loved Pat Benatar." And SHE is your Rock
issue cover girl?? You should be REALLY embarrassed.
Sleater Kinney was the only rock group listed on the cover..and they
got only half a page. Ashanti, the r&b back up singer who can't seem
to do anything without "featuring Jah Rule," has two pages.
What about the Donnas? The Yeah Yeah Yeahs? The Distillers? A mag
like RS has the power to shine important light on groups like these--
instead they are afterthoughts, and that valuable spotlight is wasted
on the same overexposed pop princesses WHO HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH
ROCK.
In your own letter from the editor you have the hypocritical balls to
say "rock radio won't touch female artists, while the pop factory
keeps churning out soundalike clones, and ambitious musicians with
something to say find themselves left out in the cold."
The pages that follow those words are a blatant display that Rolling
Stone magazine is happily working for the factory now too.
If the issue had been called "Women in Music"..or maybe "Some Cute
Girls with Top 10 Records out Right Now"..I would have no beef with
it. Corny as it may sound, ROCK is something which is still
meaningful and even sacred to some of us. Use the word "rock" in bold
letters next to a picture of Britney ****ing Spears, and you're
turning your whole publication into a joke...and an offensive joke at
that.