stewgriff
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2006
- Posts
- 680
- Likes
- 11
After a lengthy trip to Atlanta, I managed to get my hands on the best pair of cans I could find under $100: the now-discontinued HD 497. I realize they're already not being produced (and that they're now eclipsed), but I couldn't find any Sennheiser below the HD 580 line or below $249, and Grados couldn't be seen anywhere (looked through Tweeter stores, Apple Store, CC and BB). I made a last, quick, desperate trip to a CompUSA and found one last pair of these cans...next to a freshly restocked stash of Triports. Woe is the audio world, even to this noob.
Anyway, I eventually tested those Senns vs. my Shure E2C's, gotten as a Christmas present and a hearing-loss preventer (I was afraid that I had just lost $60). Holy crap! They sounded so much better from the start, with bass extension and punchiness to match the presence and ACTUAL CYMBAL NOISES. Instrumentals were also much better; on Chameleon (I admit, a crappy fusion jazz record), the horn section came to life and had spatial presence, and Ray Charles's voice sounded much fuller and more musical. I was also surprised that: 1) They were almost as efficient as my Shures, and 2) They didn't clamp my head and melt my ears, as I've seen in several reviews. They are clearly sounding more liquid and lively as I listen to them (about 12 listening hours after purchase); perhaps the burn-in isn't psychological for this phone?
I expect to see all the Headphoneus Supremi to come here and laugh at my noob opinion, but I don't have experience in good audio or an acceptable source of equipment beyond a 5G iPod or an old Sony ES amp. I can come up with $200 in a few months as good-grade rewards; how can I use this money to further audio enjoyment and, more importantly, not piss off the family with my weird spending habits?
Anyway, I eventually tested those Senns vs. my Shure E2C's, gotten as a Christmas present and a hearing-loss preventer (I was afraid that I had just lost $60). Holy crap! They sounded so much better from the start, with bass extension and punchiness to match the presence and ACTUAL CYMBAL NOISES. Instrumentals were also much better; on Chameleon (I admit, a crappy fusion jazz record), the horn section came to life and had spatial presence, and Ray Charles's voice sounded much fuller and more musical. I was also surprised that: 1) They were almost as efficient as my Shures, and 2) They didn't clamp my head and melt my ears, as I've seen in several reviews. They are clearly sounding more liquid and lively as I listen to them (about 12 listening hours after purchase); perhaps the burn-in isn't psychological for this phone?
I expect to see all the Headphoneus Supremi to come here and laugh at my noob opinion, but I don't have experience in good audio or an acceptable source of equipment beyond a 5G iPod or an old Sony ES amp. I can come up with $200 in a few months as good-grade rewards; how can I use this money to further audio enjoyment and, more importantly, not piss off the family with my weird spending habits?