The_Duke_Of_Eli
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2006
- Posts
- 2,113
- Likes
- 10
Quote:
I've read that the A700 is 90% of the A900, but it's the 10% that vouches the 80$. Don't slouch if you can afford it, or you'll take the hit on the BST and have to put down more cash. Personally I'd go with MS-1s+Pa2v2 for a basshead, especially since you have no other amp. If you could wait, swap the MS-1s for 225s. Even used 225s and a used pa2v2 could run you very close to 200$ (a bit over maybe).
Originally Posted by Head_Hermie I know these headphone will only get better with an amp, and I will be getting one as soon as I can afford it (probably about a month, 2 max). A900's sound to be the favorite, but hows the a700? I can get them for 80 bucks less, so I could afford the amp even sooner. Is there really an $80 difference between the 2? |
I've read that the A700 is 90% of the A900, but it's the 10% that vouches the 80$. Don't slouch if you can afford it, or you'll take the hit on the BST and have to put down more cash. Personally I'd go with MS-1s+Pa2v2 for a basshead, especially since you have no other amp. If you could wait, swap the MS-1s for 225s. Even used 225s and a used pa2v2 could run you very close to 200$ (a bit over maybe).