[Starsky5000]

If you didn't see my last post about Phonak Audeo releasing a multi-armature earphone in 2011 here it is:
 
http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/521877/phonak-aud-o-to-bring-out-multi-armature-driven-earphone-in-2011 
 
Now the recent email I sent to Oliver Salzmann over at audeoworld is below:
 
 
Quote:

  Dear Mr. Salzmann,

 
Can you please tell me a some more about the multi armature earphone you plan to bring out in 2011?
 
Is it a double balanced armature earphone?
 
Also will it fall into the $200 pricing?
 
Alot of people on the headfi forums are interested in this new earphone that Phonak plans to bring out.
 
Thank You,
N. Bassit
Bronx, New York
USA

 
Mr Salzmann's reply email is below: 
Quote:

  [size=x-small]Hello Mr Bassit[/size]
 
[size=x-small]What I can say at the moment is, that the multi balanced amature PFE will be absolutly outstanding!!!!! perfect sound performance!! perfect fit!![/size]
 
[size=x-small]We are sure to win again a lot awards. It will be again the best product  and the even higher price range.[/size]
 
[size=x-small]We hope to give you soon more information about the new product.[/size]
 
[size=x-small]Regards oliver [/size]

 
I started saving up. It will be my first multi-armature earphone. It seems they will stick with the PFE earphone design.
 
 

 

[Kunlun]

cute reply from the Phonak rep.

 

[mtnickel]

Awesome! I'll have to get my Phonak rep to comp me a pair Who's jealous. I work in the hearing aid sector, so it's one of my perks. Free custom molds, free Headphones.

Unfortunately, we don't carry westone, so I can't get theirs, but already got some Starkey Tunz Trio's (triple armature custom), and the phonak PFE's.
 
Perhaps I'll ask my rep if I could potentially get a good volume discount if I say ordered 20 pairs or something. I'm sure I could. They have a promotion right now for buy 6 pr get 1 free (so like 15% off), but there's gotta be room.
 
Mark

 

[Starsky5000]

I'm jealous. LOL

 

[jasonb]

sweet! i want!

 

[jleewach]

ummm.... I really wouldnt call that 'new info.' More like 'completely vague speculation w/ 0 details whatsoever.'