obzilla
1000+ Head-Fier
Quote:
LCD-3 tech specs use the metric system, except this one:
"-Transducer active diaphragm area: 6.17 sq. in."
39.8063 cm²
LCD-3 tech specs use the metric system, except this one:
"-Transducer active diaphragm area: 6.17 sq. in."
I wouldn't say this thread is off topic, but I have a feeling somebody should report something about something related to headphones in some time not too distant to avoid it from happening.
Being that the graph from my LCD-2s was dated 3/27, I'm gonna hope they still use the American dating (raise the flag, now) system, especially since this makes me happy.
LCD-3 tech specs use the metric system, except this one:
"-Transducer active diaphragm area: 6.17 sq. in."
That explains all the issues with the driver....
@ DevoricaWolf, the 3 is similar to both and superior to both in detail, separation etc. I am going to keep my rev.1s
Oh, you got me wrong - I'll keep both! It's hard to be very specific without ending up with a full review... First: LCD3 has a very smooth and polite and beautiful treble - think rev.1 with more refinement. The mids are less up front than the rev.1, probably also the than rev 2 if I don't remember wrong. The bass weight feels quite similar. What makes the LCD3 shine is all the extra texture. Separation is better, there is more air. I felt the rev.2 to be more edgy than rev.1, but the 3 feels less edgy, In a clear and revealing way. It is precise but not crisp. All texture. With the HD800 I felt the details were screaming at me, with the LCD3 it is just there. The reason I keep the rev.1 is partly because it blends the instruments more together, which also can be a very nice thing. Too much separation can make the music feel further away from you.. They are both my cup of tea, but different blends. I like having several blends to choose from
Is it "safe"?
I own a pair of rev 2's and have been sitting on the sidelines while Audez'e worked through some issues with the LCD-3. While I recently retired, I find that I can barely keep up with this incredibly active thread (5, 050 posts and counting).
Bottom line: Is it now safe to order a pair of LCD-3s without fear of one QC issue or another? If yes, what would be the earliest manufactured date that would ensure that I receive a reliable pair?
I don't see how anyone can know if its safe now without fear of one QC issue or another. Simply because someone in this thread says it looks like Audeze has addressed the problem(s) doesn't give the situation more validity than a common guess. No one really knows.