NEW Asio Plugin for Winamp2 users resampler up to 192000khz
Jul 30, 2003 at 6:24 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 13

xtreme4099

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 10, 2003
Posts
1,665
Likes
50
upto 192000khz instead of foobars 96000khz...it is clearer ..but more listening test will see about that ....

that is if you have a revo or audigy2

http://www.aikis.or.jp/~otachan/out_asio.html

note: its really cpu intensive...
 
Jul 30, 2003 at 6:57 AM Post #3 of 13
Jul 30, 2003 at 1:40 PM Post #4 of 13
Hmm, I'll see if I can hear any differences on the stock Revo output. Too bad I don't have a 192khz external DAC.
 
Jul 30, 2003 at 2:12 PM Post #6 of 13
Jul 30, 2003 at 2:42 PM Post #7 of 13
Quote:

Originally posted by xtreme4099
drop its contents in your winamps plugin folder

you also might also want the the mad plugin of course ....to set it to 24bit ...

http://www.mars.org/home/rob/proj/mpeg/mad-plugin/


I have mad, thanks for your help!
600smile.gif
 
Jul 30, 2003 at 5:43 PM Post #8 of 13
While at it, has anybody seen any hard fact evidence on usefulness of resampling above 44.1 with Revo?
I'm pretty sure the differences are very subtle, but who knows, it could as well worsen the quality..
 
Jul 30, 2003 at 6:18 PM Post #9 of 13
it does significantly clean up the high end ...its appropriate for some songs .... live version of hotel california my benchmark song ....
 
Jul 30, 2003 at 9:18 PM Post #10 of 13
Quote:

Originally posted by xtreme4099
it does significantly clean up the high end ...its appropriate for some songs .... live version of hotel california my benchmark song ....


the one with clapton?
-Mag
 
Jul 30, 2003 at 9:26 PM Post #11 of 13
from hell freezes over ... clapton one aint bad either...
 
Jul 30, 2003 at 9:50 PM Post #12 of 13
Quote:

Originally posted by PMorph
While at it, has anybody seen any hard fact evidence on usefulness of resampling above 44.1 with Revo?
I'm pretty sure the differences are very subtle, but who knows, it could as well worsen the quality..


Well you just have to use your ears. Any signal processing can be potentially bad but when it's done good enough, the benefits outweigh the pitfalls. I think that this upsampling is beneficial in some situations.
 
Jul 31, 2003 at 12:38 AM Post #13 of 13
Yeah, you're right there, lan.
But it would be encouraging (as for running through exhausting listening tests) to have at least some theoretical basis backing up the expected improvements
smily_headphones1.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top