Quote: Buy Bennyboy. End of Story. Well to be honest they're just another mid-focused iem. Nothing special.
I would go with another custom. Don't be sucked into that pool of people buying portable universals. 1964 or Jh-5 !
hmm, I guess I shall invest in a pair of RE 262 then, since they are only about 200$. Anything else I should know? (like getting custom sleeves on them)
1) If you do buy me, beware - I'm very high maintenance. I don't get out of bed for less than £2.50 and a pickled onion. 2) Anyone saying the RE262s are nothing special is either away with the fairies or a government plant employed to distract you from THE TRUTH. Probably both. Quote:
Quote: Hahahahahhaah Got to love eating you with smirnoff. No I'm serious that they're not as crazy as you may believe they are. Then again it's all personal.
SM3. Not tried the 535s but the SM3 are much more neutral than the 530s were. Had them just over a week and I pretty much prefer them in all departments to the Shure.
Quote: I'm quite sure the sm3 are extremely mid-low focused and definitely not more neutral than the 535s.
I used to have the sure se530's for a few years, then go the Earsonic SM3's. The Earsonics are much better.
I've had the 530 for couple of years, but not tried the 535, and I stand by my comments on the SM3 vs them. Seems to be a very mixed view on here in terms of how people hear the SM3 (some say too veiled etc). Personally, I think they outshine the 530 pretty much all over the place apart from perhaps with some vocals where I thought the 530 were excellent. From what I can gather, the 535 are a noticeable improvement on the 530, but sadly I'm not in a position to comment. Quote:
so now its the battle of SM3 vs RE262. Price difference... SM3 double of RE262 now i just need to hear them
