NAD v. Cal

Aug 9, 2004 at 7:06 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 4

tbutterf

Head-Fier
Joined
Dec 4, 2003
Posts
68
Likes
0
yo everybody,

I've been looking for a new redbook player for the past few months and I think I've got my choices narrowed down, but I still can't decide. I'm stuck between a NAD 542C and a used Callabs Icon mkII (perhaps HDCD/Powerboss if I can find it). I was just hoping some of you had a fresh perspective on the issue that I haven't considered. Thanks!

tbutterf
 
Aug 9, 2004 at 6:00 PM Post #2 of 4
Quote:

Originally Posted by tbutterf
yo everybody,

I've been looking for a new redbook player for the past few months and I think I've got my choices narrowed down, but I still can't decide. I'm stuck between a NAD 542C and a used Callabs Icon mkII (perhaps HDCD/Powerboss if I can find it). I was just hoping some of you had a fresh perspective on the issue that I haven't considered. Thanks!

tbutterf



Hey -- I had a CAL Icon MkII for my first hifi CD player. I think it is an incredible player. In fact, I still have mine in storage, waiting for a time that I move somewhere where I can put a second stereo. It is built like a tank, has good ergonomics, and sounds heavenly. I decided to upgrade at one point, and I auditioned the Linn Genki and Arcam CD-92 cd players in my home system along with the CAL. I think both were slightly better (the Linn was on soundstage, but I don't remember about the arcam now...it was 2 years ago), but the difference was not enough for me to want to make an upgrade. When I did upgrade, the first player to make a major difference was the Cary 306/200, which is a serious mother-******** player.
Now....I have not heard the C542, but I doubt it would be better than the Icon, and I also know it will be more expensive. It will have worse build quality than the Icon (the icon weighs 30lbs or so and is solid as a rock). That said, DAC design has advanced markedly in the last few years, at least at the highest end, so you should really try to listen to both if you can. If not, I would put my money on the CAL, as I know it is a fabulous player. It would also serve as a superior transport if you decide to add an up to date outboard DAC.

Best of luck and let us know what you decide.
Stuart

edit: P.S. My Icon Mark II was the original model without HDCD or powerboss. I bought it new in 1997 for 700 dollars down from 1000 retail.
 
Aug 10, 2004 at 8:14 PM Post #3 of 4
thanks stuartr!

I went and listened to the 542C yester day and although it does have great resolution in the midrange and treble I still prefer the icon in the bass deparment (extremely deep, tight bass with respectable slam). Also, I think the icon has far superior pacing and overal realism, two traits that combine to offer a very attractive sonic presentation. Thanks again!

Anyone else have any experience with these players?

--tbutterf
 
Aug 11, 2004 at 4:51 PM Post #4 of 4
I'm sure you've considerred this issue, but the obvious difference between the two would be age. Any Icon you find will have some mileage on it. Granted, they have excellent build quality, but if you are even the slightest bit hesitant about purchasing a used player several years old, then the NAD would seem like a no-brainer.

I owned the Icon briefly back in the day. It was a solid player and I'd agree with your assessment re: the bass. I eventually replaced mine with an Ah! Tjoeb '99.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top