I have a insert to reduce volume by ~5dB, depending on the level of the album i'm listening to. doesn't deviate from that by more than a few decibels. I have found the Volume Control (DSP) in Foobar to reduce sound quality, whereas IME PatchMix's volume limiter does not.
Also, I found that running at -10 is much better than running at +4. I can think of a good reason for this:
it sends a not-as-hot signal to foobar and the rest of the audio chain.
dithering is off, running in 32bit fixed. ASIOcaps runs @ 2ms. buffer size of 63, "Above Normal".
not using replaygain at all. should i?
only active DSP in foobar is Soft Clipping Limiter (those stupid mp3s like to clip even when volume in PatchMix is low. grrrr.) Advanced Clipping Limiter = bad, i found out over time
EDIT (from post below):
Classic Sduibek thread. Doh! I was originally writing it to say "my settings are uber, sounds best i've found so far".... but one person responds and my whole opinion has doubt cast on it now
whoops
so now i guess this is a "come forward with your awesome-sounding (or current even) PC config settings" thread
Also, I found that running at -10 is much better than running at +4. I can think of a good reason for this:
it sends a not-as-hot signal to foobar and the rest of the audio chain.
dithering is off, running in 32bit fixed. ASIOcaps runs @ 2ms. buffer size of 63, "Above Normal".
not using replaygain at all. should i?
only active DSP in foobar is Soft Clipping Limiter (those stupid mp3s like to clip even when volume in PatchMix is low. grrrr.) Advanced Clipping Limiter = bad, i found out over time

EDIT (from post below):
Classic Sduibek thread. Doh! I was originally writing it to say "my settings are uber, sounds best i've found so far".... but one person responds and my whole opinion has doubt cast on it now


so now i guess this is a "come forward with your awesome-sounding (or current even) PC config settings" thread
