Mort au CD jewel case! Vive le Mini-LP!!

Apr 17, 2008 at 3:17 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 34

IceClass

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jan 1, 2007
Posts
2,677
Likes
51
I hate the CD jewel case.

I really can't stand the damn things.

In fact, I hate the CD jewel case with every fiber of my slightly pear shaped and doughy being and after 25 years of mucking about with them I've had enough!

The CD "jewel" case is an outdated dinosaur whose illicit and underhanded mission is well past it's original purpose and sell by date.

Forget the current precarious status of it's contents: the CD itself; the jewel case's mission is illicit because it was designed to attack by stealth; while seducing under false pretenses. It was underhanded because while the precision jewel supposedly required this fiddly overpackaging, the entire early eighties were punctuated with dizzying regularity by corporate sales goons in grey suits and cheese ball grins tucking into bacon and eggs served on a CD to demonstrate it's resilience to abuse and projected longevity.
Signaling the decline of analog and the high street arrival of the new digital Compact Disk, the jewel case, as is all good packaging, was designed to inflate the perceived value of the product within.

Clasped within it's tight press, the CD was new and shiny where vinyl was all about yesterday and a dust magnet. Offering bit perfect digital precision, it strikingly and graphically signaled the new era of digital audio and the limitless possibilities of human technological progress to the dazzled and heretofore analog high street consumer.

It also unleashed upon the world a veritable deluge of broken hinge tabs, dropped media, busted finger nails and frustrated, not to mention financially fleeced punters.

The arrival of a new format is always a golden opportunity for corporate music to rearrange pricing structures and the jewel case allowed for this hansomely and did it's job well. Folks were convinced to shell out a premium for the technological "jewels" contained within and the artists got to renegotiate their contracts to reflect the latest format's potential for increased revenue streams. Their people were quick to demand and get higher royalties which *the* people, the fans, us if you will swallowed willingly while blinded in the dazzling golden glare of the CD jewel.

Corporate music got more cash, Keith Richards bought himself another blood transfusion and the consumer got stuck with the damn jewel case.

Almost thirty years later on the "jewel" has been a freebie in magazines for years and landfills everywhere are still swollen with AOL dial up CDs.

Jewels they are no more.

So why the damn jewel case?

The hinges are a fatal design flaw and are intrinsically designed to snap off and choke small chihuahuas.
Lord knows how many tons of their petro-chemical flotsam now populate the planet.
Does the music industry really think those fragile hopelessly ergonomically defeated containers still help me to part with the ridiculous sums of cash they persist on demanding for their increasingly homogenous, compressed and mediocre wares?

Are they fearful that customers flipping through rows and racks of music contained in fiberboard sleeves will equate the product with it's premium price tag to those freebies they threw away with the magazine wrapper only a few days prior and reject them?
confused.gif


They shouldn't be.

I have in my music collection a very solid percentage of CDs contained in cracked, broken, even missing jewel cases. Some of the CDs are scratched.
Some were much treasured and cost dearly.
frown.gif
mad.gif

Some were special ordered, some were rare imports and most came from a long way away with shipping charges that often cost almost the same as the CDs themselves.

Almost all came a cropper because of the inherent design flaws of the jewel case...and admittedly, on the odd occasion, overly ambitious amounts of Grolsch© and/or various other concoctions.
rolleyes.gif


Choosing a new CD from one's collection is a dicey lottery. You never know if the next one you pull out will cave in under your thumb from the crack in the cover or if the broken hinge will cause you to convulse wildly as the hinge flys in one direction (towards that Chihuahua) the cover and case fly in the other and the CD lands on the stone floor before being trampled by the kids.

Even when you do remember to be careful and check first; noting the perfectly shiny case and intact hinge there's still no guarantee the silly little teeth that grip the CD by the spindle inside haven't all broken off; inevitably sending the CD crashing to it's familiar spot on the stone floor.

Besides even the ridiculous design and inherent fragility, the CD jewel case takes up way more space than a single 1mm thick disc has any business doing.

Compare the Thickness of the CD jewel case against 3 CD Mini LPs:

2419459209_f963da4a84.jpg


Perhaps then we can imagine the miles of shelving we'd spare in our living rooms and dens not to mention our backs from humping those crates of CDs from dorm to dorm to batchelor to family home before fighting over them during your divorce when you and the missus both realize the darn things have cost more than your last new mini-van.
cool.gif
eek.gif


So why keep the whole crappy, dysfunctional charade going?

It's not working.
I don't feel like a CD is "jewel" like any more. I'm not in awe and trembling with anticipation as I trash another fifty dollar manicure peeling off the shrink wrap.

And more than anything I hate all those busted cases.

The Mini-LP CD may be less voluminous and structurally imposing than the jewel case clad product but that doesn't mean it doesn't lend itself to some nice packaging efforts as these Miles Davis and George Harrison reproduction Mini-LPs complete with anti-static sleeve and exact copy album cover and liner notes from Japan demonstrate:

2419458779_0dd3a60491.jpg
2420273516_3c66ff4f65.jpg

2419459673_5afdbffd61.jpg


So stand up and be counted and let's hasten the death of the jewel case.

And while we're wheeling in the guillotine run to your CD collections and share some pix with us of your favourite MINI LP CD and let us and the industry know if you prefer Mini-LP style packaging to jewel cases.

I apologize for the rambling rant and thank you for reading patiently this far but I've just had another one of those butter fingered moments where I grabbed more CDs than I could hold and sent them in a spray across the man-cave.

Notch up another 3 busted cases and a sadly scuffed and rare Young Gods CD.
frown.gif
mad.gif
 
Apr 17, 2008 at 3:31 AM Post #3 of 34
I didn't really read your rant, but I approve of it based solely on length. Good work.
 
Apr 17, 2008 at 3:31 AM Post #4 of 34
The modern jewel case with the chunky hinges and spindle capacity for 2 discs is very good. I'd still take a normal jewel case over any DIGIPAK or mini-LP sleeve though. Plastic is tougher, you only have to replace the case if its damaged, and that costs pennies. Damage a cardboard or paper slave and you're stuck with a damaged one.
 
Apr 17, 2008 at 3:45 AM Post #5 of 34
Quote:

Originally Posted by Duggeh /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The modern jewel case with the chunky hinges and spindle capacity for 2 discs is very good. I'd still take a normal jewel case over any DIGIPAK or mini-LP sleeve though. Plastic is tougher, you only have to replace the case if its damaged, and that costs pennies. Damage a cardboard or paper slave and you're stuck with a damaged one.


Dude.
That's not the rally to the barricades that I was hoping for.

Yer fired!
mad.gif
tongue.gif


I have every version of plastic CD jewel case and they all break. The best are the biggest chunky ones but they take up even more ridiculous amounts of shelf space.

Funnily enough, all my Mini-LPs have a sleeve for the CD.
Mini LPs stack well, they don't take up so much room and when aligned on a shelf together are quite accessible and mutually reinforcing. They're bearing up quite well. Definitely better than a lot of my battered jewel cased music.
 
Apr 17, 2008 at 4:28 AM Post #6 of 34
The worst part is that sometimes little plastic bits break off and scratch the CD. I'm with you. To the gallows with the jewel case!
 
Apr 17, 2008 at 5:57 AM Post #8 of 34
I share your hatred towards jewel cases. They get dull, scratched, and ugly way too easily, and as you noted there are serious mechanical issues as well.

I think the mini-LP packing is kinda cute...only problem is they integrate poorly into existing shelves of jewel cases, getting lost in the mix!

I much prefer the full-size LP packaging, the kind with full-size LPs inside
biggrin.gif
 
Apr 17, 2008 at 7:43 AM Post #9 of 34
YAY! I hate the damn jewel cases and the snapping plastic, too. I have so far been lucky, and only snapped cases, not CDs, in my accidents. But still ...

I'm not overly fond of CDs just stuck snugly in between cardboard either, though, since CDs stuck that way will smudge as you try to pry them out from their hiding place. Cat Powers' latest CD is a case in point. So, new packaging ain't good simply on grounds of not being a jewel case.

But I would go further than you: The CD medium itself is flawed! Especially in our day and age when the best solution is files! Sell the album on a memory card packaged nicely in a booklet (*), and you might have me back to buying physical-media music again. For now, I am rather seekng to rid myself of my CD collection.

(*) Have you seen Cecilia Bartoli's Maria. What a beauty and work of art! The CD, that is. A whole book, with the CD stuck in a sleeve at the back! That one CD (and a few like it) is the reason why I won't totally part with all my CDs yet, but only with the majority. But of course, books aren't jewel cases.
 
Apr 17, 2008 at 8:06 AM Post #10 of 34
What do you people do to your CDs that cause the cases to break so easily? I have hundreds upon hundreds of CDs, and I can't recall a single jewel case ever having broken on me.
 
Apr 17, 2008 at 8:15 AM Post #11 of 34
I really like CD-Digipaks, they're bit thinner, they can be made of recycled carboard, and the cd is still held by a plastic tray so it's well protected
smily_headphones1.gif


ful-pa-digipak03.jpg
 
Apr 17, 2008 at 8:18 AM Post #12 of 34
Quote:

Originally Posted by monolith /img/forum/go_quote.gif
What do you people do to your CDs that cause the cases to break so easily?


Play them?
 
Apr 17, 2008 at 8:29 AM Post #13 of 34
Quote:

Originally Posted by Solan /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Play them?


Do you throw the jewel case at a wall after you remove the CD or something?
 
Apr 17, 2008 at 8:47 AM Post #14 of 34
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wildsurfer /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I really like CD-Digipaks, they're bit thinner, they can be made of recycled carboard, and the cd is still held by a plastic tray so it's well protected
smily_headphones1.gif


ful-pa-digipak03.jpg



The problem with the digipak is that the only thing keeping the CD in is the little teeth in the spindle and they break very easily.
I have a much treasured Beth Orton and Terry Callier EP that is packaged in a digipak and the teeth are all gone which leaves the CD vulnerable and you have to keep the thing for the liner notes etc...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top