I preface my post by stating that I am not out to lecture on how one ought to spend their money. Rather, I just want to put yours truly's views forward for your consideration; be gentle to me
I make the assumption that most people who are reading this forum aren't in financial hardship to the point of starvation.
I don't buy the argument that if one can afford a $1M system they ought to donate that amount or thereabouts to needy people because it will change the world. Hear me out. In my humble opinion it's all relative. To the CEO of a Fortune 500 company, $10M is pocket change. To the chairman of any listed company, $100k is pocket change; To a cardiothoracic surgeon practising privately, $10k is pocket change; To a well-to-do family $100 is pocket change; To a hungry audiophile student, $10 is pocket change. Well to a starving African child, nothing is pocket change. So what's my point? To the archetypal starving African child, we are actually spending a lofty equivalent of the magical $1M dollars whenever we spend any money on audio equipment. I propose to you the following: instead of criticising others for their seemingly absurd expenditures, inspect oneself for our own expenditures for no doubt someone else will find them just as absurd, and quite rightly so too.
Anyway, I'm not completely convinced that audio companies have to charge such a huge premium/mark-up on goods, to the point where I sometimes question their business ethics. The same can be said for every other industry in the world though.
EDIT: Upon further inspection of the website, I find myself progressively disgusted at not the number of digits in those price tags, but their business model. It would seem that the price takes precedence over the actual sonic merits, and their average customer probably doesn't care much for the sound quality as long as they are satisfied with the amount they spent on it. It can't possibly sound that bad, can it?
I guess as audiophiles we have the opposite approach.