bigshot
Headphoneus Supremus
I don’t doubt there is a short term shift on big woofers, what have you got on headphones, DACs and amps?
What always gets me on the whole burn in myth is why it always makes the sound better. Why is it never the other way around? This has to be confirmation bias.
How do designers take into account burn in when they are designing their products? It seems quite odd to me that a designer would carefully spec together whatever it is they are designing and then say, "Oh hell, it'll sound even better after 100 hours!" How can they even accurately predict those changes? This also seems incredibly inefficient during the design process, and in the business world, time is money.
And why does burn in only apply to audio gear? Why don't we need to burn in our Blu-ray players? Toaster ovens? Water heaters? Garage door openers? Usually, all of those items degrade over time, but somehow audio gear only gets better.
There have been numerous studies posted all over that measured speakers pre and post burn in. While it’s true there are usually small measurable differences in air movement, SPL, and frequency response, they’re inaudible by the human ear. If burn in changes the sound of the speaker to the point a person can detect it, it’s time for new cones and surrounds.
My personal issue isn't that burn in exists because in practice it's such a vague concept applied to fundamentally different domains(mechanic, chemistry, psychology), that something somewhere will happen and will make actual sense even if all the other stuff are made up.Or televisions, or computers, or what about cars?
I think this is another good point towards just how in denial most audiophiles are - its so glaringly obvious that "burn-in" makes zero sense, yet otherwise intelligent people refuse to acknowledge that fact.
You'll notice that on this paragraph discussing what pisses me off, audio gears are irrelevant and burn in just an afterthought. people piss me off, not whatever it is that really happens to a component.