audiophilers
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
- Posts
- 134
- Likes
- 16
I've never used the V10 nor ZTE before so it'll be VERY IRRESPONSIBLE for me to do any comparison. One thing I'm 100% sure that you're right is that it's expensive, as in Cost-Performance Value. ok, now you are confused arent you? I said the Marshall London plays music well but at a low CP Value? Is there something wrong with my head? No, I repeat. Yes it plays music well, and No, the CP value is low. So what seems to be the problem? Marshall London as a Smartphone is the problem.
Before i get my hands on the Marshall London I was using Sony Xperia Z5 Premium happily. At first, I bought the Marshall London all because of the way it looks (the black leather design) and the brand itself (which I like it a lot!). As a smartphone it runs on Lollipop (Android 5.0.2), Qualcomm Snapdragon 410, 2GB of RAM and a 720p screen.The specs are complete disasters to people who prefer a premium smartphone, or at least one that you can play games on smoothly. The motion is kind of slow when you swipe through pages, the 720p screen doesn't look very sharp, the back gets a little hot after 5mins on Youtube.... etc. If you want it as a Smartphone, the Marshall London is a NO for many people, I think it's fair to say that.
So what's good about it? The biggest reason for me to stick to my Marshall London is that it makes me feel good. What? Yeah, it makes me feel good. It delivers decent details when it's playing music, the way their engineers tuned it made the music playback sound sweet and warm; it's not something that you'll see everybody using out there, it is your own personality; it's so unique that it's kind of difficult to find a perfect fit screen protector, and almost impossible to find a protective case/ bumper (but well if you do, it covers up your Marshall London so why use it? no, the screen protector is the only additional item I bought for my Marshall London). It is a package of feelings and values about yourself. It falls short for a music playing smartphone charging that kind of money, but it's more than just another music playing smartphone. The closest example that i can think of would be.... a premium price full-body massage chair that's not so good with the massage, but the seat and cushions are so comfy that make you feel like to sleep there in the living room instead of sleeping in your queen size bed in your bedroom. Wife & kids will stare at you in the morning wondering what the hack is wrong with you, but when you wake up, well rested, your body so energized and your mind so clear. You'll just look at them with a smile and say "Good morning" and nothing else, no words needed, it's an experience.
Yeah, I get that. I don't use premium features of smartphone (fancy video, camera, etc)
So do you think London's sound quality is comparable to a DAP's sound? if you have AK100 II, can you compare?
I hate to carry DAP on top of a phone so am thinking about switching to this London phone.