Looking for a CDP $300~450

Sep 6, 2005 at 12:07 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 12

razer

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 16, 2005
Posts
628
Likes
11
Looking for a really decent one that plays multiple formats from redbooks to sacd's and hdcd's. And most of the bells and whistles that a good player can offer...
 
Sep 6, 2005 at 2:10 PM Post #2 of 12
Quote:

Originally Posted by razer
Looking for a really decent one that plays multiple formats from redbooks to sacd's and hdcd's. And most of the bells and whistles that a good player can offer...


SACD and HDCD are competing variants, I do not know of any "CD" player that does both i.e that does decode both the HDCD info and non-hybrid SACD layers (of course I may be wrong), you can find Universal i.e DVD players that do both SACD and DVD-A but I do not know of any that support all three "new" formats in your price range, I would be happy to be proved wrong
 
Sep 6, 2005 at 2:27 PM Post #3 of 12
AFAIK HDCD and SACD aren't competing formats at all. HDCD is simply a way to encode data at a higher quality on redbook CDs. I think the Shanligh CDT-300 plays both. Though I could be wrong it's 2am here now!
 
Sep 6, 2005 at 8:08 PM Post #4 of 12
Quote:

Originally Posted by Garbz
AFAIK HDCD and SACD aren't competing formats at all. HDCD is simply a way to encode data at a higher quality on redbook CDs. I think the Shanligh CDT-300 plays both. Though I could be wrong it's 2am here now!


I referred to them as "variants" but encoding system is just as good...or whatever term you like.

I cede the point on the Shanling, but I think the Shanling is outside of the guy's price range
biggrin.gif
and getting both on one player is rare.
 
Sep 6, 2005 at 8:46 PM Post #5 of 12
Quote:

Originally Posted by razer
Looking for a really decent one that plays multiple formats from redbooks to sacd's and hdcd's. And most of the bells and whistles that a good player can offer...


This is... like... impossible though -- I just hope you know that.

I hate to steal the thread, but ARE there CD players you guys would recommend for 300-450 dollars (just a CD player, no multi-platform support necessary).
 
Sep 6, 2005 at 8:59 PM Post #6 of 12
Quote:

Originally Posted by Aman
This is... like... impossible though -- I just hope you know that.

I hate to steal the thread, but ARE there CD players you guys would recommend for 300-450 dollars (just a CD player, no multi-platform support necessary).



The Onix cd-88 for $299 from AV123.com thats a rebadged Music hall/ Shanling cd-25. Thats a great player to mod too if you want to increase the performance at a later time when you have more $$$$.
wink.gif
 
Sep 7, 2005 at 2:19 AM Post #7 of 12
I think the Denon players offer SACD/CD/HDCD/DVD-A.
 
Sep 7, 2005 at 5:36 AM Post #8 of 12
Erm, ok, i mean SACD and CD or HDCD and CD....
 
Sep 8, 2005 at 5:23 PM Post #9 of 12
Wow...And if its gonna cost a thousand bucks, i'am gonna kill you.....
icon10.gif
 
Sep 8, 2005 at 5:27 PM Post #10 of 12
Well, you could spend a bit more and get an Eastsound CD-E5. I've heard of people getting some very good deals through Cattylink.com

I paid a bit more myself, but that is what happens when you jump on something that is relatively new to the market. I couldnt be happier though, it is a great player. Doesn't play HDCD or SACD, but who cares... it makes your regular CD's sound great.
 
Sep 8, 2005 at 6:06 PM Post #11 of 12
Quote:

Originally Posted by razer
Erm, ok, i mean SACD and CD or HDCD and CD....


I have owned 2 HDCD players and to be honest I do not think that HDCD makes a big difference, My HD CDs (to me) sound just as good on my non HDCD players.
 
Sep 8, 2005 at 9:52 PM Post #12 of 12
Quote:

Originally Posted by jhlbbs
At least for some HDCD's I will have to disagree as it was not until I got a HDCD player I was able to actually reproduce some of the dynamic content withou My system clipping wildly. These are ReferenceRecordings classical material with big symphony orchestra and full choir.


Interesting, my HDCDs are all early 1970s pop so possibly not the best of recordings anyway. I stand corrected.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top