OK, I know that Head-Fi is the ultimate absolute Audiophile community offering as much information as one could possibly imagine. I have been reading around this website for a couple of years now and use it for all my IEM knowledge.
This site offers any information one wants when it comes to audiophile gear, but there are some lacking aspects.
I'm sure many people want to know about Long-Term Ownership Reviews of gear. See, I know this community is filled with hardcore enthusiasts who own couple of IEMs and DACs and Amplifiers etc and review them precisely. Then a new one comes out and then that product is reviewed massively on the forum, but there are many of us who just want one IEM and use it for a couple of years and then move on to the next one. For people like us, this site may offer initial SQ knowledge but when it comes to the Long Term performance of IEMs, this site is heavily lacking. For us, we spend $400 upwards only once a while and we expect our product to last us a good amount of years.
I bought the Shure E3Cs without reading any reviews and I could take a bullet for it. I bought it in 2006 and its still working superbly and I'm always under the illusion that its getting better with age. I read a couple of reviews after buying the E3Cs and noted no one pointed out these Small But Significant things.
SQ isnt everything.
Take Head-Direct gear for example. They have glowing reviews all over the WWW but no one really emphasizes on the fact that it difficult for them to even last a couple of months without heading into RMA.
This site would appeal to a broader demograph if it has a good database of long term ownership reviews, thats my 2 cents on how to make Head-Fi a more complete community.
This site offers any information one wants when it comes to audiophile gear, but there are some lacking aspects.
I'm sure many people want to know about Long-Term Ownership Reviews of gear. See, I know this community is filled with hardcore enthusiasts who own couple of IEMs and DACs and Amplifiers etc and review them precisely. Then a new one comes out and then that product is reviewed massively on the forum, but there are many of us who just want one IEM and use it for a couple of years and then move on to the next one. For people like us, this site may offer initial SQ knowledge but when it comes to the Long Term performance of IEMs, this site is heavily lacking. For us, we spend $400 upwards only once a while and we expect our product to last us a good amount of years.
I bought the Shure E3Cs without reading any reviews and I could take a bullet for it. I bought it in 2006 and its still working superbly and I'm always under the illusion that its getting better with age. I read a couple of reviews after buying the E3Cs and noted no one pointed out these Small But Significant things.
SQ isnt everything.
Take Head-Direct gear for example. They have glowing reviews all over the WWW but no one really emphasizes on the fact that it difficult for them to even last a couple of months without heading into RMA.
This site would appeal to a broader demograph if it has a good database of long term ownership reviews, thats my 2 cents on how to make Head-Fi a more complete community.