Banfi T.
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2005
- Posts
- 137
- Likes
- 10
Quote:
Also, balanced operation reduces distortion 10-20 times depending on the matching of the amplifiers. Noise floor is also significantly lowered and the transient impulse behavior is better too. So there could be significant difference in my opinion.
I did built triple mono headamps before and found the balanced version (with the same amplifier moduls) better. But to tell the thruth I got the best results with inherently balanced designes (not four amplifier, but two balanced).
Also, the third (ground channel) is good for better driving and lower noise floor but the returning current from the two drivers are "meeting" there, and thus interacting with each other. Of course this is not a big problem with very low output impedance and high current sinking capacity, but there is a theoritical limit which is not present with balanced circuits. Plus, to provide the lowest possible output impedance you have to use strong negative feedback, which is a more tricky thing to do right then to build a good sounding NFB amp (with obviously higher output impedance). A balanced NFB amp however is not facing with this problem (Outoput impedance can be higher, since the the returning currents are not "meeting" anywhere).
Errr...sorry for the long post
Originally Posted by amb I think I'd elaborate on that a bit. One of the benefits of going balanced is that it prevents the high current ground return from the headphones from polluting the input signal ground. Since the M³ in unbalanced form employs a three-channel active-ground topology, it is already immune from this phenonmenon. Thus, to this end a balanced M³ isn't going to offer the same improvement over an unbalanced M³ like you would with a conventional passive-ground amp. However, going balanced also gives you double the output voltage swing and four times the output power. For those who have low efficiency or super-high impedance headphones (such as the AKG K1000) or those who just want gobs of reserve power, there is still an impetus for a balanced M³. WIth a capable power supply and sufficient heatsinking of its output MOSFETs, a balanced M³ can output 20Wrms of power into 8Ω per channel, and that's enough power to rock a house with efficient speakers. |
Also, balanced operation reduces distortion 10-20 times depending on the matching of the amplifiers. Noise floor is also significantly lowered and the transient impulse behavior is better too. So there could be significant difference in my opinion.
I did built triple mono headamps before and found the balanced version (with the same amplifier moduls) better. But to tell the thruth I got the best results with inherently balanced designes (not four amplifier, but two balanced).
Also, the third (ground channel) is good for better driving and lower noise floor but the returning current from the two drivers are "meeting" there, and thus interacting with each other. Of course this is not a big problem with very low output impedance and high current sinking capacity, but there is a theoritical limit which is not present with balanced circuits. Plus, to provide the lowest possible output impedance you have to use strong negative feedback, which is a more tricky thing to do right then to build a good sounding NFB amp (with obviously higher output impedance). A balanced NFB amp however is not facing with this problem (Outoput impedance can be higher, since the the returning currents are not "meeting" anywhere).
Errr...sorry for the long post