1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

    Dismiss Notice

La Figaro 339

Discussion in 'Headphone Amps (full-size)' started by cal8949, Jul 15, 2010.
291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300
302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310
  1. xmdkq
    Can't reply to the mail
  2. xtr4
    P_20190304_231948_vHDR_Auto.jpg This is my end game right here: Telefunken EF86 + Tung Sol 5998

    Great details and 3D-ish staging and imaging from the EF86 whilst the 5998 provides the power AND bass. Such a wonderful combo. Thank you to those who recommended this fantastic combination. My 6XX has never sounded this good; veil lifted with bass to boot, unheard of in my 6XX till this combo.
    richie60 likes this.
  3. cukis350
  4. Josh76
  5. Josh76
    I received the GEC A2293 CV4079 power tubes (if anyone wants to try this, also requires an adapter: https://www.ebay.com/itm/1pc-Dual-G...m2f2379c67b:g:WisAAOSw2yVbtq1f&frcectupt=true) and Mullard EF-86's today and am trying them out. I decided to "cleanse" my ears by using some tubes I don't like as much. If these are as close to the 5998's as indicated then it's often very hard to tell and would be best if I had two La Figaro amps for the comparison (which I don't). As expected, the "cleansing tubes" still annoy me and became fatiguing after a while.

    The GECs are some great tubes and more reasonable for your budget compared with the 5998. 4 A2293 CV4079 tubes + adapters should run less than $200 vs $300 (or more) for a pair of 5998's.

    These definitely sound very similar to the 5998's, open/airy, detailed, clear. Some punch, could do with more (I would say the same about the 5998's). Lively without being fatiguing. Voices are great, male and female. Good for a wide variety of music. So far I've tried classical, classic rock, 70's jazz, 80's pop, and recent pop. All really good.

    The Mullard EF-86's are also nice, my only complaint is I prefer the bass on the Philips 6SJ7. I have a Loki, after adjusting the settings all is well.

    Worth noting the gain is very high with these, I almost fell out of my chair after switching!

    This is a great combo with the HD800 (+ SRD mod). These headphones thrive on clarity and detail which this amp + tubes delivers. After I tweak the settings on the Loki, this sound is hard to beat.

    Now if everyone can stop recommending more tubes I will finally stop spending money on this amp! :wink:
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2019
    xtr4 likes this.
  6. adeadcrab
    Haven't been on head-fi since the site redesign.. great to see some new LF339 users :)

    I've had this unit for a few years so I guess I'm a veteran now, huh? *Leans over to check the tubes..* Bendix 60850WB (graphite plate) and Tung-Sol 6DJ7T (mesh plate) as the power / driver tubes, sounds great as always.. although only one pair of the Bendix :D

    Closest to the 5998 I have are the Tung-Sol 7236, rebranded as Cetron.. really neutral solid state sound with those power tubes in there. I even rock some Shuguang 6N13PT power tubes from time to time, they sound very neutral too :D
  7. adeadcrab
    Those work with the 'bright' version of the LF339, which apparently is the default (and rightly so, imo).

    If you've got the 6AS7G / 6H13C/ 6N13P compatible amp, this will work. And very well too if these reviews are accurate :wink:

    5998 / 7236 / 6080 are also compatible model numbers. Though worth mentioning the graphite bendix 6080WB is not the same as, say, the thompson 6080. They are both compatible but only a few have that truly exceptional sound.
  8. africanus
    FYI, La Figaro 339 is now available from Massdrop in both 110V and 220V variants.
  9. whohasaquestion
    Only if this amp has line-out...
  10. xtr4
    Nothing a 1/4" to RCA cable won't fix haha
  11. Mizicke5273

    I got my CV4079/A2293 adapters and some GEC CV4079 tubes in over the weekend. Took a few tries to get them settled in. I had some sound quality issues with them originally, but I narrowed it down to being a bad paring with my Telefunken EF 86 driver tubes and my Beyer DT 880. I swapped in a pair of Telefunken EF 800 and had much better results.

    This combo is very smooth with, what I think is, the best bass that I have heard from my La Figaro. It is very nice listening to this combo with my LCD-2c and Aeolus. So far, I think I like this tube roll better than my Mullard 6080 & EF 86 roll; which was my favorite and go to before.
    xtr4 likes this.
  12. Jacobal
    Has anyone tired the Bendix 6080wb tubes? Are they worth the high price tag? Are they really that much superior compared to the other suggested tubes?
  13. attmci
    Nice tube. But don't pay the current eastbay price.
  14. Jacobal
    How much would you pay for a pair? And have you actually tried it?
  15. adeadcrab
    I was just using the 6080WB last week before i rolled in the 7236 for a solid state sound.. so solid state that I had to eq the treble down using the DT880 :)

    I can try the 6080WB and give a comparison. From what I remember they gave a wide soundstage and imaging, with a strong bass presence.

    edit: before I give a review on these tubes, I'll tell you what I paid for them:

    Year: 2015
    order: Quad Matching JAN CTL Tung-Sol Branded Bendix 6080WB NOS Testing Graphite tubes
    price: £195.00 GBP (256 USD)

    At the time this was a pretty good price, and for four (4!) of these tubes.

    The current ebay listings I've seen are 2 slotted plate 1962-era tubes for $400 USD... these are not prices for tube amp owners, these are collector prices... If you really want this tube AND you also have a tube amp, you could get them. May as well get some 6H13C tubes which can be $35 per pair and realistically, would sound 75% as good as any other tube.

    On the other hand, limited supply of these NOS tubes is driving the price up nowadays.. and the bendix 6080WB will likely never fail :wink: And these are the slotted version, which are supposedly better than the solid graphite version of this tube.
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2019
291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300
302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310

Share This Page